This is still too, @#$%ED, up, and instead of terminating this instructor’s contract for hire, they’d, only gave him that, slap on the wrist! Off of the Newspapers, translated…
The Kaohsiung City Government Fined the School $180,000 for Breaking the Laws of Child and Youth Protection, the School Hadn’t Responded if They’re Going to Terminate His Teaching Contracts Yet
A middle school instructor, Chen in Kaohsiung was suspected of long-term sexually bullying his students, sexually harassing the students, using the derogatory remarks to verbally abuse his students, the Humanistic Foundation last year demanded that the school terminate the contract of Chen, the school only terminated the contract to teach for him for six short months, the Humanistic Foundation went to the school, to object, demanded that the school stopped hiring the unfitting instructor. The school called an evaluation meeting, and used the privacy clause, said that they’d already sent the teacher’s evaluation up to the Department of Education, to discuss whether to terminate the contract of hiring, and refused to tell if the school will, terminate his contract to teach there.
The social services stated, that the instructor will be fined $180,000 for “abusing children or teens physically or psychologically”, and the name of the instructor will be posted to the public to know; the head of the school’s PTA stated however, that the instructor, Chen may be a bit tougher, but was very responsible, that his behaviors may not have been correct, but not to the point of having his contract to teach terminated, and there were students who’d wanted Chen to keep on teaching, the school already did its best, to fend for the right of students to get an education best as it could.
The office manager, Chang of the southern branch office of the Humanistic Education Foundation told, last year, as Chen started out as the homeroom instructor of the first year middle school class, shortly after the school started, they’d received the complaints from the parents and students, that the instructor would smack the students’ heads, pinch their ears, and, cussed their parents out for not teaching them, that the students are way worse the dogs, and to the male students who couldn’t focus in class, he’d asked, “did you stay up all night to watch porn?”, or mocked the female students, “maybe, I’ll see you, with your pregnant belly on your graduation three years from now.”
At the end of last year, the Humanistic Foundation already demanded that the school terminate the contract to teach for Chen, the school held a gender equality evaluation, and the investigations on the accusations toward the instructor were all found to be, valid, and for the matter of sexual harassment, the school issued the punishment of terminating the contract for hire for six months, and the bullying portion, due to how it’d been reported, and the school already gave the instructor a written warning, they’d done away with punishing him this time, and this terminating his hiring contract for six months meant, that the students will have to be subjected to his abuse of them the next semester, that the school had totally, neglected the right of student to be educated.
The principal of the school stated, that the instructor had been on the teaching staff for twenty years of the school, that some of the beliefs of teaching that the instructor carried may be a bit, outdated, that they’d already, negotiated with him on it. The school also held another teaching evaluation, and had invited two of the expert scholars in law and child development to attend, and they’d also allowed Chen to state his case, and in the end, they’d voted anonymously, that the behaviors of the instructor would be written about in an evaluation, and submit to the Department of Education for review, the Department of Education stated that it will review over the records, and see what needs to be done.
And so, this, is how this teacher still got away, with her/his, improper behaviors toward the students, and, this sort of an instructor, if the accusations were valid and true, should NOT be allowed, anywhere NEAR a student, think on it, parents, would you want an instructor like stated above, to teach your children? And how can you, the parents, continue to subject your own young, to this sort of abuse and continual mistreatment? Given that the accusations made were found true, that is.