The Taiwanese Version of Cambodian Human Trafficking Case, the Scam Rings Tortured the Victims to Death, the Jury Found it as Assault Causing Death & Not Murder

So, this is, due to the LACK of understanding of the LAW, from the, laypersons, because this WAS, apparently, MURDER, instead of, MANSLAUGHTER, as the perps intended to TORTURE the victims to DEATH, because they wouldn’t comply to being, SOLD, and in these charges, the juries of their peers is, SHIT!  Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

Liu and four other members of the scam ring two years ago, took the owner of the dummy account they used, Lin and tortured him to death, then, disposed of his body at the public cemetery, this case was noted as the “Taiwanese Cambodian Human Trafficking Case”, after four days’ worth of deliberations by the jurors, although the D.A. stressed how the victim was treated inhumanely and tortured to death, and asked the courts to find the perps guilty on murder, however, the jurors only believed the act of murder was caused by severe assault, and gave the four defendants anywhere from ten years six months to sixteen years six months sentences.

Because there were multiple defendants of this case, with the various degrees of involvements, the district attorneys used the mannequin from the fire department, with the defendants, reenact what had happened, then, used the injuries that’s caused the victims to die, to make the diagrams into computerized animations, to show the crimes of the defendants to the jurors.

do these people, look like, they’re, “sound enough” to make a call, on whether or not someone is guilty or, innocent? I think not! Because they are NOT trained in the “law department”…illustration from online

In the district attorney’s arguments, the four plaintiffs were found to have uncertainties in intent to commit murder, bad behaviors, and, no signs of remorse in torturing of the victims, and suggested to find them all guilty on murder, and sentencing them to anywhere between twelve to eighteen years.

The defense argued, that the four had no intentions to commit murder, that some of the defendants were pressed by money, that they were only, forced into the torture because of the money, and there were the accused who’d not physically participated in the torture, the disposal of the bodies, and asked the Collectivist Courts to give them anywhere from seven to twelve years.

The community are critical of the courts being too lenient toward the scammer due to recent years’ influx of scam cases, the High D.A.’s office asked the first and second trial district attorneys to discuss the details of the cases more thoroughly, with the input from the offices of investigation, criminal investigations agency, to discuss the factors which should be taken into account in the cases, to get more evidence, so they can close these cases more precisely.

On the Cambodian scam means of controlling the drop-off delivery persons, to give all who were involved in the cases who are higher up operators, a more severe, sentence.

So, this is, what the “jury of their peers” get them, a SLAP on the wrist, despite how these victims were tortured AND murdered, because this is a organized crime ring, with the lower members taking the orders from the top down, that’s why, those who are charged, those who are caught got away with, manslaughter, and, the jury of their peers, just isn’t right, nor does it give justice, BACK the victims of these crimes, who WERE, tortured to, DEATH!

The Laws of Not Giving Those Under Eighteen Who’d Committed the Heinous Crimes Life Terms Should be Amended

The FLAWS in the, JUSTICE systems here, and the adult crime rings are still, using this, and there SHOULD be the amendments for a HARSHER punishment for the adolescents who’d committed the more severe crimes of murder, aggravated robberies, etc., etc., etc. for sure!  Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

At the funeral of the middle school student who got his neck slashed and died awhile ago, the families issued their statement, that age should NOT be a factor of the imbalances of crime and punishment in justice.  This heart aching call, made us all, feel sad, it’s just that currently, the laws mandated that those offenders under age eighteen should not be given the death penalties or life terms, and there is no way, that these rules can be, amended.

Based off of penal code, the murderers will be given ten years and above prison sentences, life terms, or given the death penalty, and as the victims of the murders are minors, by law, there would be the increasing of the half of the sentencing to the perpetrators.  Only, in children and adolescents, those under fourteen, can’t be responsible for their own behaviors, thus, no punishments, given; fourteen-to-eighteen year-old offenders, they get their punishments reduced, because of their limited responsibilities over their own, behaviors.  And based off of penal law, perpetrators under eighteen shall not be given death penalty or life in prison.  Like for the case of neck slashing of Hsinbei City, despite the cruel measures the perp used in murdering the classmate, because he is under eighteen, he will not be given the ultimate harsh sentence, he may even get a reduced sentence due to his status of being a, minor.

And so, this, is on how the laws protected the minor offenders, because of their young age, they hadn’t fully developed, and, giving these perps the harshest sentences of death penalty of life in prison would be unjust and unfair, but, how fair would it be, for the families of the victims, to see that the one who’d, brutally attacked and MURDERED their next-of-kin get nothing more than just a slap on the wrists?  Besides, how would you know, that these teens who are going to commit the murders, the armed robberies, etc., etc., etc., aren’t taking advantage of this FACT, that the justice system won’t sentence me to life or the death penalty because I’m still a, minor?  So yeah, this is, a HUGE H-O-L-

E, in the, justice system all right!  But because the teens had yet to become fully matured in their, prefrontal cortexes, we can’t held them accountable for, murder, because the processing center of moral hadn’t, “grown in” in them, yet!

The Neck-Slashing Case Caused the Upsets in the Local Communities, There were the Headshots of the Suspects Blown Up as Ads, Hung on the Streets

There are, better ways to, express how upset you are of what happened, other than, posting the personal data of the teenager who’d committed the crimes to the public, and you’d, broken the laws, voicing your, upsets of what had, happened, and this can easily led to vigilante justice!  Off of the Newspapers, translated…

Not Only Did the Photographs Get Exposed in New York, They Showed Up in Wugu as Well, the Individual Who’d Posted Them Called Out to the Communities to Pay More Mind to the Problems in the Society, the Department of Health Welfare & Sanitations Found the Behavior to Have Broken the Rules, Demanded the Hsinbei Fine the Individual Who’d Posted the Banner Out

like this, just blown up, and plastered on the billboards close to the freeways and highways…photo from online

The society paid strict attention to the neck slashing case of middle school students, awhile ago, a famed YouTuber, “Young Merchant” as upset how the district court demanded the personal data of the adolescent male who’d committed the stabbing and the adolescent female who’d asked him to do it down, the famed Youtuber posted the photos and names the two perps on the electronic billboards in New York Time Square.  And yesterday, there was an ad agent, Chou who’d, posted an ad with what seemed like the portraits of the adolescent male and adolescent female out on the walls, with the words, “Angering Gods and Man, the Laws won’t Tolerate You.”li

The adolescent involved in the case is only fifteen, and listed as a concerned teen by the social services registry, and the family that he is from is also lifted as a high-risk family, and receiving the assistance from social services too, the case is processed in juvenile court, and the teen will be placed into Yangming Middle School. Chang stressed, protecting the identity of the teen who’d committed the crimes doesn’t mean that there’s no empathy for the victim of the case, that she only hoped there would be more care and concerns shown to the adolescents.

Chang pointed out, that based off of the laws of children and adolescent protection, it’s up to the city government the punishment for posting out the personal data of the teenage offenders.  The social services of Hsinbei City stated, that currently, they’re focusing on getting all the help the victim and the family of the victim’s needs fulfilled, as for the billboard in Wugu, they have no comment on the matter.

And so, this, is how an individual voiced his upset of the violent stabbing in the school of Hsinbei, and he had a right to express his upset, but, by posting the personal data, the photo, the name of the student, he’d, broken the laws, and he’s an adult, so he should know, better, but he didn’t, and he needs to get punished for posting the personal data, as that is an invasion of privacy.

The Physician Was Accused of Sexual Assault in the Staircases, the High Courts Changed the Verdict, Due to Insufficient Physical Evidence to Not Guilty

The female college student had a history of mental illness, and there was no, physical evidence, so the sexual assault charges were, dropped…off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

A physician from MacKay Memory was accused by a female student on Dcard that he’d pulled her into the stairways and sexually assaulted her, and was indicted by the D.A. on forced sexual acts, during the trial, the female student committed suicide, cursed Wang on her suicide note: “I hope you rot in hell!”; the first trial found Wang guilty, sentenced him to six years, but the High Courts of Taiwan believed, that on the date, the female student showed Wang the sex footages herself, and that her cursing him out would NOT be evidentiary that sexual assault had, indeed, happened, tossed the original verdict yesterday, and found Wang not guilty.

The married physician, Wang had met the female student through the internet for over a year, and after he’d been accused of rape, he’d resigned from his position; he stated yesterday, that a lot of things, wouldn’t be convenient enough for him to talk about, but in the first trial, the psych evaluations showed that the female student showed no signs of posttraumatic stress disorder, he was grateful that the High Courts had, cleared his, name.

The indictment stated, that on December 28^th, the female student went to MacKay Memorial Hospital to the psychiatric department to get treated, and asked Wang out to meet, Wang used the excuse of “showing you some pictures” to lure the female student to the fourth floor emergency exit of the Gospel Building and sexually assaulted her with his fingers, and asked her to fellate him.  The female student called it in afterwards, claimed that Wang told her he was taking her to a “secret place”, but instead, took her to the stairways to rape her, she’d pushed him away, but Wang stated, “I want it”, and forced her to swallow the semen he’d, ejaculated.

On June 21^st, 2022, the female student committed suicide, left the note: “You SCUM, I curse you after my death…you will not end well!”; Wang admitted to leaning in toward the female student to sort through the photos, that they were holding each other, and fondling one another with their clothes on, but he’d never, sexually assaulted her.

The boyfriend of the deceased claimed, that after the sexual assault, she’d made three suicide attempts, and that when they got intimate, she got reminded of what happened that day and melted down, kept apologizing to him.  The Taipei District Court confirmed Wang had committed the sexual assault, criticized that he’d used his professionally status, gained the female student’s trust, then sexually assaulted her, that his behaviors were, malicious, sentenced him to six years.

Wang appealed, and claimed, “that never happened”.  The High Courts found, that before the incident, the female had chatted with Wang frequently through an app, that the contents were sexually illicit, and she’d invited him to look through the photos of her nude, that it was still questionable, if Wang had fondled the female student against her, will; while the staircase was a place where people are coming and going, that if this was a viable location where the sexual assault had occurred, was also, questionable.

The female student had been psychologically ill for many years before, had treatment records on file, the mental distress, if it were caused by Wang after what happened to her, is still in question, besides, the medical professionals who’d treated her from before the date of the supposed sexual assault, on the day of, and the day after, in the group therapies, there were no signs of trauma or anything abnormal with her behaviors or mental states.

The female student left three final notes, for her parents, her boyfriend, and for the physician, Wang, the High Courts believed, that there may have been many reason which led her to commit suicide, that although Wang was immoral, but, the courts can’t confirm that the rape the university student accused him of had happened; the female student’s testimony wasn’t in line with the facts objectively, and there’s no reinforcement for her accusations from the reviewing of other evidences, the physician’s guilty verdict was, tossed.

But, the college student had, committed suicide, and maybe, something had, happened to her, that pushed her over the edges, but we will never know what it was that drove her to suicide, as her mental states may have played a vital role, and the traumatic experiences she had contributed to her suicide too, it’s just, that there’s no, PHYSICAL evidence that this physician had, sexually assaulted her, that’s why the charges were, dropped, but that still doesn’t mean that he didn’t do it.

And whether or not he did it, only the physician knows…

The Adolescent Felt Upset by the Officers’ Attitudes, His Two Friends TORCHED the Patrol Vehicle to Get Even for Him

Impulsive behaviors, standing UP for our friends, due to our, not-yet-completely developed PREFRONTAL CORTEXES, and now, all of them will be charged with vandalism, damage of government properties, yada, yada, yada…a loophole in getting away with the severity of crimes they committed because of their young age, off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

The seventeen-year-old Chang was involved in a scam as a pickup driver, two days ago he was picked up by the officers of the third substation of the Taichung Police, after the interrogations, he was sent home, the teen was suspected of being upset over the attitude of the officer who interrogated him, he’d complained to the adolescent, Sun and the nineteen-year-old man, Chu, Chu and Sun in the midnight hours of last night, went to the substation, and committed arson on the patrol vehicles, but the fires were put on in time.  The police immediately arrested all three, after the district attorneys interrogated them, Chu was charged on public endangerment and taken into police custody, the two adolescents were sent to juvenile court.

adolescents in juvenile detention…photo from online

The third substation of Taichung was chasing a case of hundreds of thousands of dollars being withdrawn fraudulently, found the seventeen-year-old middle school dropout, Chang was involved, two days ago, they’d notified him to come to the police station; after the interrogations, Chang complained to his seventeen-year-old best friend, Sun, his nineteen-year-old pal, Chu that “the police use a bad attitude in interrogating me”, the two felt the need to back up their friend, bought the gasoline in the plastic bottles, in the midnight hours of last night, they rode a scooter, with the license plate covered up to the outside of the substation, Chu lit up the toilet paper that was stuffed at the opening of the plastic bottle, tossed the lit up bottle toward a squad car parked outside the station.

The two escaped after they’d committed arson, the locals found the fire, rushed into the station and told the officers on duty, the officers were able to put out the fire in the shortest time, and reviewed over the surveillance footages afterwards, and five hour later, they were all arrested at a rental suite in Xitun, Taichung, and the police confiscated another plastic bottle with gasoline in it.

During the police interrogations, Chang claimed, that he was only, “pouring his troubles out” to his friends, denied the allegations of telling his friends to commit arson on the police vehicles, Sun and Chu said, they were only, “backing Chang”.  The case will be prosecuted on juvenile laws, public endangerment, obstruction of public affairs, and the teens are going to get sent to Taichung Juvenile Court to try.

The city police’s adolescent crime unit captain, Kao told, that they hadn’t seen an increase in adolescent crime rates, but the increased severity of the criminal behaviors of teens is alarming; the means of the country in handling crimes involving minors is “paperwork and warning”, as the adolescents committed the crimes, they’re sent to juvenile detention, but due to the misconceptions of the adolescents not getting tried as adults, they are easily used as the tools to commit the crimes by others, and how to prevent the teens from committing more serious offenses, this needs to start from the facets of education, legislature, and counseling.

versus the adult inmates…photo from online

And so, the “not tried as an adult” became a get-out-of-jail-free card for these younger people who committed the crimes, because they’re, not “of age”, so even IF they committed the adult crimes such as murder, rape, aggravated assault, etc., etc., etc. (the more serious offenses), they are still, not getting a harsh enough punishment, and the adult-led crime rings are using this, as a hole in the justice systems.

The Nanny Who’d Shaken the Young Booy to Brain Damage Found Not Guilty of Abuse, Sentenced Lightly

Got away on a “technicality”, because this woman’s BAD behavior, of SHAKING this infant boy too hard, causing him to become, brain damaged, did NOT have the “intent” of abuse in her behavior, and this is still SHIT, how this justice system, worked, off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

A nanny, Chen, because of the eight-months-old infant boy she was taking care of won’t stop crying, she got upset, and started shaking the infant really hard, to the point that the infant started vomiting, his eyes started rolling to behind the lids, to the point of becoming, brain damaged, the first trial found valid evidence for Chen’s abuse of the young infant boy, sentenced her to five years six months on adult intentionally harming young children on purpose; but the second trial found, that Chen’s shaking the infant boy was different from burning a child’s body with a cigarette, which constitutes as “torture”, that what she did was only, an ordinary physical assault of the infant boy, toss back the original sentence, and gave her a light sentence of four years six months.

The indictment pointed out, Chen (age 49), was hired to look after the infant boy in December of 2020, but because the infant started crying hard, she’d picked him up, and shaken him really hard, causing the infant to suffer brain damage, and became developmentally delayed, the maternal grandmother of the infant boy found the grandson vomiting and gagging, took him to the hospital to get checked, and that was when the families were told, that he had been, abused.

During the trial of the Taichung District Court, Chen denied the allegations of abuse, claimed that she’d not abused him, the courts compared the medical records of the victim, found that although he was premature born, but there were no records of epilepsy or brain damage, that it was during the time when he was placed under Chen’s care he’d started showing the signs of vomiting, convulsing, and other abnormal signs, and Chen’s polygraph showed that she was, hiding something too.

The first trial pointed out, during the time the infant was left in Chen’s care, the boy had suffered from the repeated severe shakes, which was the sole cause of his brain injuries, Chen’s intentionally shaking the infant, based off of societal interpretation, it’s “torture”, sentenced Chen to five years six months.

The second trial’s investigation confirmed, that Chen, in order to discipline the young infant, shook him really hard, but was still different from physically beating him, whipping him, and burning him with a cigarette to cause the physical harms, that it’d not constitute as having damaged the growth of children, the severe physical assault, that her actions only classified as the ordinary kind of assault.

And so, because there is NO “intent” proven in this case, this unfitting nanny only got a slap on the wrist, and, what of this brain damaged young infant boy, he’s going to need long-term care, maybe, placed in an institution, because he won’t likely be able to, care for himself, due to this BAD nanny’s behaviors toward him, who’s going to pay for that,  huh???  The law still isn’t in favor of the victims of these crimes, the law does NOT protect the victims, there’s NO justice in this!

The Case of the Overturning of the Nanny Accused of Abuse, Lesson to be Learned: We Should Leave the Investigations to the Professionals

The public still have the tendencies to become the judge, the jury, AND the, executioner here, and this is, really, bad, because you hadn’t gotten ALL the FACTS straight yet, and you’d, rushed to, conclusions, dragging the woman’s reputations through the mud, and now her name had been cleared, but, her reputation is still, in the M-U-D, even IF it’s proven, that she’d not done, anything wrong, with the angry mob mentality, taking the public, over!  Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

Two years ago, an eleven-month-old infant girl fell in her nanny’s home and died, the parents suspected the nanny for abuse, and as the famed youtuber told of the case, the online community had, gone against what the nanny had, done, and the parents of the young infant girl became, vigilantes too.  But awhile ago, the autopsy of the infant girl found residuals of ketamine, that the infant’s father tested positive for the substance also, turning the case around, the cause of death is “by second hand use of illegal substances”, that the nanny didn’t neglect her duties, and the charges were dropped against her, which turned over the “local community’s trial” of her.

Actually, this is not the very first case of the people acting as the judge, the jury and the executioner, and it won’t be the, last, as the online community loved playing the roles of the judge, and the, investigators.

The psychological experiments showed, that if you constantly suspect that your neighbor’s kid was stealing from you, anything s/he does, made her/him, suspicious; but as you’d found what you’d, misplaced, the child’s behaviors, don’t make her/him seemed like, the thief.

The case of the elderly couple who’d owned the café at Danshui was broadcasted fully and overtly by the media press, and most of the public believed that the landlord was an, accomplice, that he was good at, faking his, innocence; as the police conducted the investigations thoroughly and completely, and the evidence showed the landlord had absolutely, ZERO involvement, how he’d looked, down-to-earth, and honest then, this is, the interactions of people’s stereotypes with the halo effect.

As I was younger, I’d lacked the allowances, and longed for the snacks, and so, I can only, steal from my own mother, and surely, I got, found out, but, after a certain incident my mother’s “crime-solving means” became, more careful, because she’d mistaken my older brother as the one who’d, stolen her, keys.

When my mother had worked during the harvest seasons to make the extra cash, she’d not ridden her bicycle for a long time, parked it under the roofs, and worried that someone from the neighborhood by steal it, or take it for a ride, and she’d kept the keys inside her winter coat pocket, and one time she’d come home, and couldn’t find the keys to her bicycle lock, and she’d stubbornly believed, that it was my older brother who’d, stolen it, and beaten the crap out of him, and as he’d fallen asleep from crying, she’d, waken him up, and beaten my brother up again, then she’d, remembered, that she’d, hidden the keys, and felt bad for what she did to my older brother, and she’d, “treated” us out.  And, after this incident, my mother became doubtful of herself, as she couldn’t find her money, because dad didn’t believe her, had her rummage through her things once, to NOT “scapegoat” on the rest of us, and, I, who’s the, real thief, started laughing secretly, like I’d, dodged the cannons of a war!

And, all of these scapegoating cases tell us, that we all need to have that balanced mind of judgment when we watch the news, the national news, the international too, we can easily make a mistake, following the crowds.

And so, this is on how we are, easily, misled, by the news media, and, in the end, by the time these accused individuals finally got their innocence proven, they already got their reputations dragged through the mud, and no amount of repatriation (payment from the government for making it up for accusing you wrongfully!) will be enough, because the reputations is, completely, gone, like the case of the drugging of children in the preschools of Hsinbei city from awhile ago.

The Families that Were Broken by Murders, & They Can Only Shoulder Everything on Their Own, the Courts Didn’t Even Notify the Victims that the Trials were in Session

How the justice systems, failed to consider the rights, the feelings of the victims, and their families, in the trials, and that needed to get, altered, because if it doesn’t, then, justice still will never get, served, the, right way!  In need of reforms in the justice systems here, off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

The Families of Victims Sighed: the Government Didn’t Even Leaven the LEAST Amount of Dignity

The scales of justice started leaning toward the, defendants, the victims getting ignored is, a cause of upset, the justice reform is the discussed by the committee of the legislature, to let the victims get the information on the trial first hand, but, awhile ago, the Highest Court tried the dual body murder case by Chen, after the facts were stated, the judge changed the sentence to life-term, what made the victims’ mothers even more shocked, was that when the trial became, neither was notified by the courts, and the families sighed, “we don’t have any dignity to be respected to be called to the courts for the trial”.

As the justice reform meetings are finished, the “Little Light Bulb Case” was trialed, the mother of the victim child wasn’t told by the courts that the killer had been in custody until the trial began, she’d criticized the justice reforms as “not giving an ounce of respect to the victims!”, that was when the High Courts immediately started up the trials, to make up for it, but, similar things kept on, happening, repeatedly.

Eight years ago Chen murdered the two men, Tsai and Tsai at gunpoint in only ten minutes at the Er-Mei Parking Lot, he’d gone through the trials, and five times he’d been sentenced to die, Tsai’s mother, Yang, started from his first trial, had been there in court, going from Taichung to Taipei, and yet, as Chen was tried in the Highest Court, “I’d not run to the finishing lines”.  She’d, criticized that the highest courts may be reasoned in the fact of holding the trials of her son, but she wasn’t, notified of her son’s trial being held, and she just, couldn’t, swallow it.

A female school teacher who’d won the special excellent teacher’s award was robbed by Liu at random, sexually assaulted and then, murdered eight years ago, the first too the third retrials all sentenced Liu to death, the case is now in its, fourth retrial, as the court was in session, Liu’s attorney, Huang wanted to get another opinion on the psych evaluation of Liu’s state of mind during the time of his crime, the female instructor’s husband, Chang declared, that the courts had sent the murderer to get evaluated by the Kaohsiung Veteran’s Memorial Hospital, the Kai-Shun Hospital already, how many more times do we need to evaluate, his words showed how helpless he’d felt, of how the law couldn’t, give his murdered wife the justice for her, death.

Chang said, that to this pint in the trial, he was so afraid of putting his own children through the trials, and shouldered the stresses all by himself, he was tortured psychologically and physically too, the man caused him to “lose everything”, while the defendant’s attorney was still arguing about the validity of the psych evaluation of the perp, “Why is the justice system so lenient toward the perpetrators!”.

Tang committed arson, killed six, the attorney, Hsieh was hired by the victims’ families, but, at the trial at the Highest Courts, she’d, handed in the pleas to fight for the victims, but the court justice denied the pleas, and she can only, take off her attorney’s robe, and handed in the pleas of the families in the document’s office afterwards.  While the families of the victim can only, sit in the, “auditor’s sections”.

Hsieh believed that the families were given a voice in the first, and second trials, but, as the case went into appeal to the highest court, the voices of the families, got, silenced, “this is what’s most unjust!”.  She’d stated, that the Highest Court was the third trial, and, in the trials by law, the defendants can speak up in court, so how come the families of the victims, can’t?  And the courts also did NOT notify the families of the trial’s time.

Hsieh believed, that surely, the Highest Court did NOT break any laws, but, it’d lacked the humanity, and this is one of the primary reasons why the public had been, upset toward the justice systems, one of the biggest reasons is the attitude of the court, a little more understanding, a little more, empathy, it can help the families of the victims feel, a little, better.

So, this is what happens, when the factor of, humanity did NOT get considered by the justice systems, yeah, the justice system had done everything right, held the trials, as just as they possibly can, but, it’d, failed to recognize the needs of the victims’ families, how they needed to be, included in the process of the trials, because, it’s not just about the facts, but also, the court systems need to, consider the side of, humanity too, and that’s what the current justice system lacked in this country right now, and it will take more than justice reforms, to finally have those, god damn, high up justices, to disrobe themselves, to come back down from that, high pedestal…

The Turns of His Fifth Death Penalty Verdict, the Murderer of the Dual-Body Case Confirmed to Serve a Life-Term

Because there’s no, “premeditation” that’s why, this MURDERER, escaped the DEATH PENALTY, and besides, this added to Tsai’s “take death penalty off the tables”, this case because a tool in politics, nothing more!  Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

The Suspect, Murdered Two People in Ten Minutes, the Highest Courts Believed He Hadn’t Premeditated on the Murders, and Made the Calls, the Criticisms from the Families of the Murdered Victims Came

The parolee, Chen, eight years ago, at the parking lot in Ximenting, in only ten minutes’ time, murdered Tsai and Tsai, he’d gone through five trials, which all ordered the death penalty for him, the Highest Court believed, that Chen, before he’d shot Tsai, had waved to him to tell him to leave, but because Tsai turned around to look at the murdered victim, that was why he’d, gunned Tsai down too, that it wasn’t, premeditated, that his actions weren’t of serious enough criminal behaviors, tossed back the original verdict yesterday, and gave Chen the life term.

As Tsai’s mother learned of the verdict, she was shocked and inquired, “did the murderer, get away?” criticized the Tsai government for doing what it pleased, only wanted to take the government where she wanted the government to go, that many of the cases of murders, the victims can’t get justice; the verdicts from the Highest Courts, offered no, justice whatsoever.

She’d made a statement again last night, that the Highest Court’s considering how the murderer didn’t premeditate the murder, “is the Highest Court hard-of-seeing clearly, or is the Highest Court, blind”?, stated that the verdict was “toilet paper like”, served the means of opening the doorway of doing away with the death penalty, that karma will eventually come to the officials of the government.

the supporters of keeping death penalty in place,”no reasons for murder, the only punishment is the death penalty“…photo from online

The Highest Court pointed out, on the means of Chen, murdering Tsai, the courts employed the civil liberties, and political rights of the international laws, the U.N.’s human rights sixth interpretations, believed, that Chen gunning Tsai down was a “most severe of crimes”, but, the interpretation of the sixth already got replaced by the public opinion 36 back in 2018, that the considerations of the situations under which crimes were committed must be taken in, to NOT decide on the death penalty based, solely off of the severity of crimes.

The Highest Courts found, that Chen disregarded the lives of others, used the ferocious means to murder, that he’d impacted the safety of the society greatly, but, considering how Chen had, sent Tsai away first, the after he’d murdered Tsai, he planned to leave, walked toward the elevator of the parking lot, saw Tsai approaching, he’d waved to him to get away, but as Tsai turned his head, he discovered Tsai’s body, he worried that his murdering the man will get told, that was why he’d, killed Tsai as well, that it’s a spur of the moment thing, that it wasn’t, calculated.

And, Chen had fired his gun at Tsai from a distance, it wasn’t execution style, that it didn’t qualify as a most severe, and he got the life-term; on the murder of Tsai, the third retrial found no fault of the verdicts that came before, thus, maintaining the life sentence.

On January 13, 2015, the shooting at the parking lot at Ximenting, the drug cartel members, Tsai and Tsai’s bodies were found, stacked one over the other, inside a car, the police later arrested the chapter member of the Thento Union, Chen, the courts believed there was no chance of reforming him, the first trial, the second, the first retrial, the second retrial, and the third retrial, five times, sentenced Chen to the death penalty.

And so, this, is how this country tried to “match up” to the “clause” of cruel and unusual punishment, with absolutely NO considerations of how these victims were gunned down, only cared about the perp, and that’s just, SHIT, as justice still did NOT get, served, but hey, look on the bright side, this murderer will now be tortured, for the rest of his life, behind bars, with the families of the victims, feeling, that justice still, was NOT, served, at all!

If the Death Penalty IS, “Cruel & Unusual” Punishment

Yeah uh, this is still, BULLSHIT, if you ask me, buy hey, who asked Y-O-U!!!

If the death penalty IS, “cruel and unusual” punishment, then, what of the severe methods those perps had, tortured their vics, before they finally put them out, of their miseries, what of the perp that cut off a woman’s genitalia, after raping her, and then, murdering her, huh?  Wouldn’t that “constitute” as, “cruel and, unusual” too?

And yet, these “human right’s activists” from all around the world kept preaching on how we all need to, do away, with the death penalty, and should we now???

I mean, if the world’s completely without the death penalty, then, the EIGHTH amendment of the U.S. Constitution would be, struck, off of that, thousand year old, document, wouldn’t it???

And, consider this, IF it were, your loved ones who were, tortured, and brutally, raped, then, had their genitalia CUT off, just because the perp C-A-N, would you still feel, that death penalty was, “cruel” or, “unusual”???

If it’s, cruel and unusual, to hand down the death penalty and, enforcing that, then, wouldn’t BE, tortured by ones’ own, guilty conscience for what one has done to another, be even more, crueler?

So, do NOT bullshit about things you hadn’t weathered through there, higher up officials of every single country.