The Husband Cheated on Her with a Part-Time Employee in the Company, the Second Trial, the Wife Won on the Right of Spouses

After they’d, DECRIMINALIZED, adultery in this country here, and the husband still got away, without punishment for cheating on his own, WIFE here…off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

The married man, Chang had an affair with a part-time female employee, Liu at his office, took her to Penghu on a trip, and signed as Liu’s “boyfriend” on the surgery she’d needed, his wife, Hsiao found out, sued both and asked for $840,000N.T. for their damaging her spousal rights; the Penghu District Court, tossed the case, using that the spousal rights aren’t protected by law, Hsiao appealed, the Kaohsiung Subsidiary Court’s Collectivist Court believed that marriage should be protected, that the marriage can’t allow for a third person to break it up, turned the verdict around, found the two guilty, and they’d needed to pay Hsiao $200,000N.T.s.

After the Grand Justice decriminalized adultery in the reinterpretation of the constitution back in 2020, although the original spouses can file for the civil suits, but, a lot of the cheating parties and the ones they’d cheated on all, objected, by using what the Grand Justices’ decisions, that the original spouses don’t have the spousal rights, and refused to pay up.

The second trial of this case, the Collectivist Court mentioned the difference between humans and animals, the Collectivist Courts believed, that sex is for the sakes of survival of the species in animals not humans, those with the more assets, have more spouses, and, if due to the lacking in resources, causing the means of polygamy or polyandry, then, there would be, NO differences between humans and, animals.

The Collectivist Court found, that there are, the flaws of monogamy, but, more guarantees should be given to the spouse with lesser means, the parties are united by marriage from their own free will, on the matter of loyalty, there should NOT be a third person, there’s no allowing physical intimacy with another outside of the union, and it shouldn’t be that since adultery was, decriminalized, the rights of the spouses are, eliminated altogether.

illustration from online

The verdict found, that Hsiao and Chang had lived separately after they were wed, during November of 2020, Hsiao found her husband had related to Liu like a married couple, they’d gone to Penghu to travel together, gone to the gynecologist’s office, after she’d collected all the evidences, she’d, sued them both, demanded $840,000N.T.s for their cheating together.

The justice of Penghu District Court, Chen believed that the Grand Justices’ decisions of decriminalizing adultery, that there’s no protection of the spouses’ rights to not get cheated on, interpreted that the rights of the spouses aren’t protected by the law.

At the time, the verdict quoted, “love is something that someone can give, but not ask for”, from the book, “The Soul isn’t Under the Jurisdiction of the Law—the First Course in Law for Modern Day Citizens”, and reiterated that the matters of love, isn’t under the jurisdiction of the law, found Hsiao to lose.

you can get caught like this, and, there’s, nothing your spouse can do! Photo from online

Yeah uh, this is the results of the government’s, decriminalizing adultery, and now, we can all, FUCK like rabbits, cheat on our husbands and wives with however many men or women we feel like having sex with, because, the law protected us, because the law had stated that spouses had NO rights, so, what would then, be the “institution” of marriage again?

Oh yeah, all of you (I’m still NOT one of you out there!), who are married, who are, planning on marrying, get CHECKED into that mental ward (institutionalized???), and put yourselves in that, STRAIGHTJACKET, because the law does NOT protect the rights of the spouses who stayed true in the marriage, any more, because it’s our rights to love whoever the hell we want to, to sleep with, whoever the FUCK we want to, to FUCK whoever we so, please!

Weighing the Individual Right to Have Sex with Whoever One Chooses More than Rights of Spouse?

What the @#$% is this?  So now, we can go and FUCK (so???) whoever we want to, no matter if the one we’re sleeping with is married, or not, and it wouldn’t matter IF we’re, married or not either…how the amendment that “zoomed in” on individual rights IS FUCKING (so???) up the “institution” of “marriage”, and yes, it’s still MY personal belief, that those of YOU who wants to get married, SHOULD be, “institutionalized” still…off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

The Extramarital Affairs Gained the Minority Supports to Fight, the Courts: Based Off of Individual Interpretations

The female judge of the Taipei District Courts had ruled that spousal rights aren’t protected by the constitution, ruling that the law guarantees “the freedom of sexual acts”, found the other woman not guilty; the man, Yeh took Liu, the other woman to a motel, and he was sued by his own wife for $600,000N.T.s, the man and the other woman used the claims that they should have the sexual freedoms to fight the charges, but the Taichung District Courts found, that the verdict was based off of the particular court justice’s own interpretation of the law, that it’s NOT the long-term ruling, found Yeh and Liu guilty of adultery, that they both will pay the wife of Yeh $200,000N.T.s.

Yeh’s wife stated, that Liu took the advantage of working with her husband, got between them, last year in March she was at home, caring for her children, her husband used the excuse of a business trip, took Liu by car to a motel in Nantou, that they’d had sexual intercourse there, that they’d both infringed her right as his spouse, she’d sued her husband and Liu for $600,000N.T.s.

Yeh fought the charges, stated, that “the rights of the spouse” isn’t a “written right” in law, that it’s a concept of practical means, and that the legislations of “sexual decision rights” should trump the spousal rights, so, adultery isn’t a crime at all, not mentioning, how it’d not, broken the law of, marriage, that he and Liu had gone to a motel, but they’d not had sexual intercourse, that his wife had NO basis to sue him.

and now, even AS you’d, caught your spouses (1@a time!) doing this with another, you still can’t SUE, because adultery is DECRIMINALIZED!!! Photo from online

Liu also said, that there’s already questions in the country’s beliefs about spousal rights, Yeh and his wife’s relations hadn’t been a husband and a wife’s means of interactions, that their relationship was broken long before she got involved.

The courts found, that Yeh and Liu’s behaviors, not considering the fact that they went to a motel together, but, based off of social norm, it’d clearly, exceeding the normal friendships interactions, found that Yeh’s spousal right was, infringed, that Yeh’s using that his marriage with his wife being broken already, to justify his sleeping with Liu, considering the occupation of both, and the incomes they bring in, the courts found that Yeh and Liu need to pay Yeh’s wife $200,000N.T.s.

Yeh and Liu fought the verdict, that the defining of whether or not a marriage is well is subjective, that this wasn’t a guaranteed right of the law, that even if it’s protected by law, the individuals’ sexual rights should get prioritized over the spousal rights; but the Taichung District Court found, that the ruling was based off of the individual court judge’s interpretations of the particular law, that it’s based off of the personal opinions of the judge, that it’s NOT a long-term practical belief.

And so, this, would be the outcomes of the country’s legalizing adultery, by decriminalizing adultery, because now, two consenting adults can FUCK, with a total disregard of how they may have damaged the rights of their own, individual, spouses (if they have them!), and this is just SHIT!

And yeah, marriage IS, that, “institution, that EVERYBODY checks out of, that way, we can all, fuck whoever the hell we so choose, no strings attached, and this is the mess that comes after the country’s decriminalizing the act of, adultery, some years ago…

The Wife SUED the Other Woman, on the Retrial, She Won the Case and the Other Woman Needed to Pay Her $120,000N.T.

And it took how many tries before the WIFE finally got the “justice” she deserved, to get BACK AT her cheating husband and the other woman again???, that’s, two trials, and one retrial, that’s a total, of, THREE!  Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

As adultery had been decriminalized three years ago by the grand justices, the Taipei District Court justice, Lin found, that the constitution is valid in that it emphasized the right of individual actions, and denied the existence of spousal rights, found that Chen, the wife who’d sued the other woman for $800,000N.T. to lose the case; the second trial found that the papers filed for the charges didn’t get to the other woman, that the process was flawed, that the verdict of the first trial is tossed, and sent it back to retrial again.  The first retrial of the case by the Taipei District Court found that the other woman had damaged the spousal right of Chen, and found that the other woman needed to pay Chen $120,000N.T. for the damages.

After Wu made a rare call, she was criticized.  The legal experts told, that the second trial was retried again, due to the misses of the proceedings, skillfully, dodging the debates on spousal rights, the verdict of the first retrial found the other woman lost, and she needed to pay the wife, which showed, that Wu’s interpretations are from minority.

Chen sued, that from April to June of 2019, her husband called the other woman deep in the nights frequently, and in August, they were caught holding hands, she’d found him to be in an affair with the other woman, and asked for $800,000N.T. from the other woman.

In the first trial, the presiding court judge, Wu is the daughter of the grand justice, Wu, she’d believed, that the grand justices’ interpretations of adultery being unconstitutional, that in the past, the constitution stressed the protection of the marriage and the family rights, that it’d changed, into the focus on individual independent rights; the spouses are independent, that they don’t have the right to dominate over how one person could act if s/he were unfaithful in the marriage, that in the clauses of the constitution, there’s no guarantee of spousal rights, that the other woman didn’t need to pay.

Chen didn’t see this fitting, appealed.  The second trial found, that the papers of the cases that were sent by the courts to the other woman’s registry location of Pingdong, and her residence in Hsinbei, that nobody signed for them, and the papers were sent to the local substation, and the courts had the police visit, that the other woman hadn’t resided in the location where she’d been registered to, while the address she had in Hsinbei was for the sake of her children’s school district, that she’d moved her household registry to, but she’d never lived there.

The second trial found, that because the other woman didn’t receive the papers sent by the courts, that the proceedings of the papers being filed wasn’t legit, and the verdict was discarded, sent to retrial again.

Based off of understanding, the other woman had texted Chen, “Your husband’s passed out drunk in my bar, and slept with me in my home”, Chen texted her husband, “it must be hard on you, to SHACK up with your whore, running to and from Taipei and Taoyuan every day”, the husband responded back, “I’m with her in bed now”, “this is what I want”.

The retrial of the first trial found, that the man had spent the night with his affair, that he had, interacted with her in the means, sexually, and mandated that the other woman need to pay the wife $120,000N.T.s.

And so, this, is the aftermath of decriminalizing adultery, I mean, it was simple, you CHEAT, you get SUED from before, and now, because we are all for our own individuals rights to exercise our DICKS, our VAGINAS, or rights to FUCK, to fall in love with whoever the HELL we want, that’s why there are these cases right now, with the wives, suing THE other woman, and the husbands still don’t even get that SLAP on the wrists, even when they’re the ones who can’t control their DICKS in the first place, and they call this, advances in women’s rights, as this country prides itself on being more advanced in the rights to protect the victims of rape, sexual assault or whatever, and yet, there’s NO right guaranteed to the spouses because these judges don’t have their HEADS screwed on STRAIGHT!

An Army Officer Used the Army Base as a Motel, the General’s Vehicle as Cover

How this gives the morale of the armed services, that bad, R-A-P!  Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

 A case of extramarital affair had been discovered in the Navy Headquarters, the female navy officer, Guan used the general’s vehicle as a cover to get herself away from the base.  The Navy Headquarters stated yesterday, that both the male and female officers involved had been given more than “two major reprimands” as punishment, and are both being evaluated for dishonorable discharge, while the sentinel guard who was keeping watch over the gates of the navy base will be evaluated for not doing his duties correctly.

The married lieutenant colonel Chen who was the secretary of a higher up general, awhile ago, got drunk outside the army base, and was helped back to the command headquarters of Dajr by a female ranked school officer, the two were accused of spending the night together at the bedroom of the North Sea Building.

The reports stated, the female officer, as she’d entered into the camp in the evenings, she was dressed in her casual clothes, the following morn, she switched to dressed up in the army officer’s uniforms, rode out of the base in the general limo, and because the sentinel saw it was the generals’ limo, he’d not stopped to identify the identity of the female officer.

The Navy headquarters stated, that this case after they’d looked into it, there’d been the breaches of the rules of operations internally, that the involved had interacted out of what’d expected as their behaviors, and they’d already called on the evaluation committee to rule over the case, and had decided to give both the man and the woman more than two major reprimands at least; and they’re considering terminating both their service terms by dishonorable discharges.

The Navy Headquarters stated, that the navy will use this case as an example, to continue to strengthen the internal management processes, the disciplines of the armed services, and the training of the sentinels and follow the strict rules of “severe evaluations, severe rulings of discharge, to keep these similar cases from recurring.

And so this, is how the immoral behaviors of TWO individuals, made the reputations of an entire unit go down the drains, and because you are serving in the armed services you are expected to have a stricter set of moral standards for yourself, and yet, you two couldn’t keep your hands off of one another, and, you’re, married, and on top of that, you had sexual; encounters with one another in the armed service vehicles too!

It Was Him, Wasn’t Her, He’d Raped His Wife with Dissociative Identity Disorder & She’d Sued Him

How this loser still took advantage of this woman’s trust in him, abused her trust, raped her, and now, he would be, charged!  Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

She’s His Girlfriend & His Best Pal, Kao Disregarded the Advice Against Him Doing So, “Wanting to Get His Girlfriend’s Personalities Out”, Indicted on Forced Sexual Assault Charges

A man, Kao from Taipei met a married woman online with “dissociative identity disorder”, with one of her milder personality alters, started dating, and, became buddies with another of her more masculine personality, and yet, as the married woman came to him in the personality of a best friend with him, and, raped her, against her will, the Taipei District Court yesterday charged him on forced sexual assault charges.

Dissociative identity disorder, means that there are more than one personalities living in a single person, and every personality is unique, with separate emotional responses, memories, and different ways of interacting with the external environment; the various personalities would take turns controlling the individual, as one personality surfaced, the previous’ personalities’ behaviors were all, forgotten.

Based off of understanding, the married woman had been diagnosed with dissociative identity disorder, and her husband knew it too, and so, he’d allowed her to have other men as her companions when she’s in her alter states to even be in love with others too.  in April of this year, the milder personality wife used a friendship app, met Kao, the two quickly became a dating couple, and had sexual intercourses multiple times.

During the time when they were dating, another tougher alter of the woman also came into being, and, the tougher personality also befriended Kao as well, the two would interact as buddy buddy with one another.  And because as the married woman switched from the alters, her tone of voice would change too, and Kao knew the difference of her varied alters, and there was no misunderstanding who he was with at the time.

In June, the woman went to Kao as the buddy buddy to chat, and Kao knew that she was in the more masculine alter then, and wanted to see if he could get “satisfied” with her like when she was in the alter of a married woman, or that if he’d managed to satisfy her, he may be able to get her more feminine, girlfriend side to take over, disregarded that the woman’s feelings of getting forced.

At the time, the woman who was in the alter of the tougher personality screamed at Kao: “Don’t you test me!”, and Kao still raped her, the married woman called the cops and sued him for the rape.

During the trial, as the D.A. put the woman on the stand, it was the tougher alter of the woman who’d come out, stated that at the time, Kao had gone against her will to rape her, Kao also admitted that she was in the alter of the “buddy buddy”, when he’d gotten to have sex with her too.

And so, this is how it goes, you think you can take advantage of the woman’s D.I.D., that she was just going to take your crap lying down, well, she wasn’t, besides, if one of her alters was willing to have sex with you, that still doesn’t mean that you get to FUCK her when another one of the alters had taken over her.

Not Recognizing the Rights of the Spouse, the Other Woman/Man’s Not Paying for the Adultery Getting Tossed Out

The rights of the spouses, OUT the window, because, adultery is no longer, a “criminal” offense!  Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

As the Grand Justice tossed back adultery as a criminal offense, the woman, Chen asked the woman, Hong who got between her and her husband to pay her $800,000N.T.s in civil claims.  The Taipei District Court justice, Wu used the definitions of the Grand Justices’ mandating that the respect of personal choice rulings, tossed back Chen’s claims, it’d started up discussion in the society; the case is appealed, the Taiwan High Courts found that the paperwork of the case had not been sent legally to Hong, that the proceedings were, flawed, tossed back the verdict of the first trial, sent the case to be retried, and, skillfully, avoided the debatable issue of the rights of the spouses.

Because there was the verdict from the first trial, that the case was sent back, not due to flawed procedures, based off of the rules, the district court will assign a different judge to the case to rule it.  The legal realms analyzed, that the justice, Wu had long-term been different in opinions with the practicalities of the cases, that most would deem him as a “minority”, but there’d been multiple differences of opinions on ruling that’s become, the mainstream interpretations, and the outside world is interested in how the verdict will turn.

In the verdict, Wu pointed out, that based off of the Grand Justices’ announcing the adultery claims as a noncriminal offense, the stresses of the constitution of protection of marriage, of families, is now, turned into the individuals’ choice.

In the ruling, she’d quoted the point of view of the grand justice, that the spouses are independent of one another, that there shall be no restriction on the individuals’ behaviors based off of the marriage, that each is independent in the way s/he acts, that in the changes of the constitution, the rights of spouses should NOT exist, therefore, in the first trial, Hong wasn’t mandated to fine.

And so, here, adultery became, legalized, and, the spouses, can’t go after their cheating husbands or wives for sleeping, fucking around, because hey, that’s our, personal choice, to FUCK whoever we want to, I mean, the LAW can’t make us be faithful to just that one other person, for life, ‘til death!

The Judge Ruled that the Other Woman Didn’t Have to Pay for Breaking Someone’s Marriage Up Based Off of the Rights of Sexual Freedoms Law

So, as spouses, there’s NO law, restricting our husbands or wives from, cheating on us, because they’d already, decriminalized adultery in this country here already, cheating, getting caught but found NOT-guilty by the courts here, off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

Quoting the Grand Justice’s “Spousal Rights aren’t Guaranteed by the Constitution”, in a Similar Case She Resided Over, She’d Found the Original Spouse to Lose the Case a Second Time

The woman, Lin accused her husband for having an extramarital affair with another woman, Wang, and, SUED the other woman, asking for a million dollars N.T. for the damages, the Taipei District Court Judge, Lin believed, that spousal right isn’t included as a constitutional right, or legally binding, and, the constitution prioritized that the right of one’s own sexual freedoms, that the happiness of a marriage isn’t guaranteed by the law, found Lin to lose the case.  This can be appealed.

This was the second case, that the justice, Lin found the wife lost in the cases of obstruction of spousal rights, last year on November 30^th, as she’d passed down the verdict she’d pointed out, that based off of the explanations of the Grand Justice, number 791, it’d stated, that there’s no guarantee of the rights of the system of marriage, instead, the focus was switched to the “spousal sexual independence” that the law does NOT admit that a spouse can control the other party, this caused the debates from all around; the case is now pending appeal to the high courts.

And so, this, would be, too, problematic, because, everybody has a difference of interpretation, different explanation of one thing, and, if the verdict is based solely off of the justices’ own beliefs of whether or not something is legally bound, then, I’m sure, that after this case, there will be, a hell of a lot more cheating spouses, who think they can, get away with cheating on their spouses, with no consequences to their own, bad behaviors, because, hey, this case proves that adultery is NOT against the law here!

The Tongue-Twister Laws of Extramarital Affair, is STILL Extramarital Affair, What’s Meant as Proper or Improper Relationship?

The wordings of the law…this is a total, loophole, how the government department sponsored program tried to explain his ways out of having an extramarital affair, off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

The Tongue-Twisting Ways of Saying Extramarital Affairs, is Still, Extramarital, Affairs

The course title I’d started teaching again at Huafan University, the logics of romance; based off of traditional logic, the definitions are important, defining something clearly, then, we can, decide if the claims are true or false, then, formulate our theses based off of this.

Recently, the Department of Welfare & Sanitation’s Medical Welfare Foundation C.E.O., Wang was busted for his extramarital affair; at first, he’d stated of the woman, she was someone he’d known for a very long time from work, denied having dated her, and that they were having an extramarital affair.  But since the paparazzi came, in the chases by the various news media press, Wang finally publicly stated on FB, that this matter is private, that he’d handled it improperly, that it’d caused his team of professional and families, troubles, and openly apologized; then, he’d, taken himself out of the public’s eyes, until awhile ago, he and his wife got interviewed by the magazines, and told of his own behaviors as “improper, unfitting, that it wasn’t good of him, that he wasn’t, the idealistic, spouse.”

Fundamentally, this is a private matter of Wang’s life, but the problem lies in the wordings he’d used in the interviews, that he is, a public figure, and what he stated, mattered, and it has a sort of a defining of a marriage for the rest of the society, at the same time, it’s a matter of personal morale, and honesty too.

What’s meant by extramarital affair, I’d asked the students to define in my lecture, most stated that it’s having emotional connection, sexual intercourse with another outside of one’s own, marriage.  And I’d, asked them to define it a bit, farther: if it’s just a “smuggling of emotions”, or a one-night-stand here and there, would that also constitutes as extramarital affairs too?  Basically, my students would believe that one would need both, for the extramarital affair to stand up, that, without the sex, the smuggling of emotions, or those one-night stands without the emotional attachments are only infidelity to one’s own spouses, that it constituted only as improper, unfitting, relationships.

And so, as Wang defined his own behaviors as “improper”, “ill-fitted”, what does he mean? 

This simplified question of logic, means, that all extramarital affairs are improper, and shouldn’t happen, but, based off of logic solely, the validity of this question finds, that all improper, unfitting behaviors of sexual intercourse, all constitutes as extramarital affairs.  And so, Wang not only tried to explain his own way out of using the “improper”, “unfitting” to describe his own bad behaviors, he’s also, seemingly into misleading the logics behind what constitutes as extramarital affair, and NEVER spoken of the word, “affair” in relating.

There’s no first-come-first serve in love, only the “other man” or “other woman” who was ill-fitted, but, there is, a first come first serve in marriage, before the first one leaves, and the one who came later, barged in without consents, it is, extramarital affair.  And, at present day, extramarital affairs aren’t just a matter of morality, it’s also, legally.  Although Taiwan had decriminalized adultery based off of the grand justices’ interpretations, but there are still the civil fronts of the matter, and this can be an important basis for the divorce cases.

The divorce rates are on the rise here in Taiwan, the sanctity of a marriage, outdated and no longer existed.  But even so, the behaviors in a marriage still carried the moral and ethical bindings of the law.  Connections and sexual intercourses, isn’t the vaccine for a marriage, only through rationalism, and responsibilities, can you see clearly, the relations in a marriage, and, what’s fitting logically is one’s own interpretations of how one’s own marriage is fitted or ill-fitted.

Love will change, and a once-fitted marriage will be, ill-fitted, the modern day society is not on the staying true to one spouse until the end, but on how when someone changes, s/he needed to explain her/himself thoroughly, completely, and there should NOT be any lying, or unfaithful behaviors to one’s own, spouse.  Especially for these public figures, as these “improper, unfitted” extramarital affairs happen, they should admit that they had an affair, then, it’ll be private matters how they selected to handle the matter afterwards, that way, it’d, eliminate a lot of the argumentative things, that might affect one’s own, professionalism at work.

And so this is still on how the professional, mixing with the personal, will always and forever, yield that bad results, it’s still, easier said than done, because, everything professional can and will GET mixed with the personal, when that sense of connection, that feeling of, “mutual attraction” occurs, and, you still can’t help who you get turned on by, it’s, that physiological response we got NO control over.

And no, I’m still not saying, that these extramarital affairs are right, it’s immoral, but people are still, doing it, because they can’t control their hormones (for women!), or DICKS (for men!)………

Obstruction of Spousal Rights: the Harder the Individual Cheated, the More the Person’s Made to Pay in Civil Court

That ought to, TEACH you, mother FUCKING cheats, to BEHAVE your selves out there all right!  HARSHER punishment for infidelity here, protecting the rights of your spouses!!!  Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

Last year, as the decriminalization of adultery was, signed into law, the payments in the civil courts suits became, the LAST line of defense for protecting spousal rights.  Recently, there was the famous married sports figure having been found with an unknown male out, and the rented stay of a member of the city representatives, the legal realms pointed out, that although there’s NO solid proof of adultery, but the behaviors had, breached the “rights of the spouses”  And, sorting through the related verdicts of the courts for the past two years, the more severe these breaches in spousal rights were, the amounts are higher, from thousands of dollars to millions of dollars.

In the past, on the matter of the couple’s handling cheating, because there’s a more severe mandate for what constitutes as “adultery”, so long as there are no solid evidence to prove that sexual intercourse took place, it would be, quite, difficult, for the charges of adultery to stick; as the decriminalization of adultery signed into law, the adulterers won’t get charged criminally, but, because of the civil laws protected the citizens, there are the clauses of the law, the party who was cheated on can seek out payment from the civil front.

The attorney, Wang stated, that the definition of “spousal rights” legally meant the rights protected by the law based off of ethics, of family; once one of the spouses crossed that line, then, the other party can sue the cheating party on the civil front for payment.

Based off of the verdict inquiry systems of the courts, in recent years, there was a wife who’d found her husband, flirting on LINE, his got sued, and the courts made him pay $70,000N.T.s; the wife found to have hugged and kissed a male coworker, the husband received the payments of $160,000N.T.s; the wife found the husband to have sexually illicit texts on LINE, with the photos, paid $200,000N.T.s; the husband cheated on the wife with a female employee for seven years, had twins with the female employees, the wife was paid over millions of dollars.

And this, is only, on the legal fronts, how about, the EMOTIONAL distress, the betrayals of the one getting cheated on, NO amount is, going to EVER, make UP for that, because the damage’s done already, and, there’s, just NO way that anybody, can help you make up for that, NOT even if this brand new “amendment” that enforces HARSHER punishments for the CHEATING parties, so this is just, a bullshitting law that THINKS that it can, protect spousal rights, but it can’t, not really!

A Woman Spied on Her Husband Who was Having an Affair, Followed Him from Taichung to Fujian, Case Solved

Women are great private investigators when it comes to things like this that’s for sure, as this loser still attempted to WEASEL, and he was unsuccessful, because his WIFE is, too intelligent!  Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

A woman, Chen found it odd, that her husband often went to China, once she’d followed him there on the ships, and forced him to admit, “I have another woman, with kids” I needed to deal with; she’d wanted to just turn a blind eye, but as her husband had the webcam chats with the other woman in front of her, she got furious, sold the land, and pressed charged against him.  Although Chen’s husband told, that “I’d admitted to having another woman to get under her skin”, but the courts used the voice recording files, and mandated that he needed to pay his wife $300,000N.T. for the emotional distresses.

In 2018, Chen found her husband had gone to China quite frequently, and every time he’d not told her he was going off, and took a ton of cash away, she’d started suspecting that he had another woman in China.

At noon on August 19^th, Chen found her husband, after waking up, rushed in the shower, and headed off in a hurry, she’d asked, “Where are you going?”, he’d, dodged answering her, and told her to butt out, then, rushed off.  She’d shockingly thought, that he may be off to China again, and checked and found her husband’s passport gone, decided to follow behind him.

As Chen took her passport to the Port of Taichung, bought the fare, and she’d found her husband for sure; he’d refused to tell her why he was heading over to China, she’d decided to tag along behind him, followed him to Fujian, as they reached shore, her husband told her, “I’m with someone else in China, I have a child too, I need to take care of it.”, asked her to give him time so he can, try to get rid of the child, and take care of the other woman.

Chen was forced to accept it as a fact, but cherished her marriage too, decided to give her husband a second chance. But, she’d found that he’d gone to China again, to cohabit with the other woman, and had webcam conferences with the other woman with her right there, she’d decided that she was done with forgiveness, sold off the land that her husband gave to her as a gift, and sued him for encroachment, and demanded that he paid her in court.

Her husband claimed, that during the time he was away in China, she took up with another man, after they couldn’t communicate, to get his wife angered, that was why he’d lied about how he was having another woman too, but he didn’t.  He said, that he’d lied about the other woman a long, long, long time, that his wife was suing, to cover up the fact that she wanted the assets left by his families to him, to divert the attention.

But the judge reviewed over the voice files provided by Chen and found Chen stated, “it’s you!  You’re the one taking up with another, and have a child too, and you asked me to prove my faithfulness to you, how do you plan to handle this?”  Her husband answered, “I will deal with the other woman.”  Chen stated, “You have another woman”, and he’d stated, “I’d already, broken it off with her…………”, and based off of that, the judge believed that the infringement claims were, true.

And this still showed???  Oh yeah, we women keep on forgiving, and forgetting, while you MOTHER @$!%ERS keep on humping around, with your whores, and now you have an illegitimate child, you still ask us to put up with your FUCKED (don’t pardon me here!) up ways?  And we’re all what?  Just supposed to look the other way, and feel blessed that you LOSERS still come crawling back?  Well, I got NEWS for you FUCKERS (don’t pardon!): we won’t, because we’re all done, forgiving, and we will, NEVER forget, as in, E-V-E-R.  Not in this sort of a serious betrayal.