PATTY GIDDIS Inbox – iCloud 3:23 am Fine let’s talk this way To: email@example.com Daddy, Maybe this way you won’t hang up on me again or worry about my roommate knowing my sordid secret. She’s not even here to peek over my shoulder at what I’m typing – actually would never […]DADDY by Kristin Garth — Punk Noir Magazine
Category Archives: Excuses
Reasons W-H-Y, a divorce should be, allowed, by the courts, off of the Newspapers, translated…
The Civil Law stated that of the ten reasons for divorces, one was “with untreatable illness” but, there were the two couples, one in Taoyuan, the other in Yunlin with the wives filing for divorces on the reason because both husbands had strokes and became, paralyzed, and one couple was allowed to divorce, the other, wasn’t, the legal experts stated, that on reviewing over the decree of divorce, the justices would not just see the illness that one party has, but whether or not the marriages can keep going.
The couple, Wang in Yunlin had been married for twelve years, the husband is an alcoholic, later he’d suffered a stroke, became bedridden, the wife filed for divorce on the fact that he can’t get better, she said, she kept consoling with him to stop drinking, but he’d refused to listen, that was why he’d ended up having a stroke, became paralyzed, and so, her husband played a major part of damaging the relationship; and the husband’s legal representative, the mother-in-law, went to court, and, agreed with the daughter-in-law’s, claims.
The mother-in-law told, that her son had been an alcoholic for more than a decade, three years ago, he’d had a hematoma, and became paralyzed and was placed in a care home, that her daughter-in-law wanted a divorce, and, she would be willing to set her daughter-in-law free. The judge based off of the diagnoses, confirmed that Wang couldn’t care for himself in daily living, that he couldn’t communicate with the outside world, causing the marriage to only be valid in the form, that there’s no way of affirming if his stroke has direct relation with his long-term alcoholism, and so, the courts approved the divorce on “other major reasons”.
The couple, Liu in Taoyuan, the wife also used the fact that the husband had a stroke, and became untreatable in his condition, to file for divorce, but the judge tossed the case, based off of the verdict, the man suffered a stroke two years ago in February, causing him to become paralyzed, and because of the increase in care expenses, plus the woman had conflicts with the means of caretaking, and the assets, she’d started having depression, and wanted to divorce.
But the judge based off of the diagnostic confirmation from the hospital, that although the man had a stroke and is paralyzed, he’s still lucid, and after physical therapy and medication, his movements, responses are, improving, that there’s still the possibility of him recovering, and found that the husband’s conditions aren’t bad enough, that the woman’s not getting along with her in-law’s side of the family isn’t related to the husband, tossed back her divorce claims.
The legal experts analyzed, that the judge would consider on two levels the reasons of divorce was “untreatable conditions”, one, the illness itself, two, does the illness affect the marriage, what’s defined as untreatable illness doesn’t mean that it has to be terminal, normally, it means that there’s no curing the person in the futures to come; as for the untreatable conditions means the diseases that would cause harm to the spouses’ body, like the STDs.
But, with the advancements of medicine, practically, the definitions of the clause needed to get updated too, the highest courts had a newer explanation, that “the untreatable illness” should be interpreted as “enough to impact the maintaining of the marriage, and an illness that’s hard to treat”.
And so, this still showed, that you can’t find your way out of a marriage, just because your spouse is ill with something as these cases showed, that the cases are decided separately, that each case with its own unique situations, and that should be considered.
The Man Who Got Turned Down by a Woman He Was Hitting on Raped Her Using His Fingers on Site at the Super Convenience Shop
And this PERP committed the crimes with WITNESSES there, watching him too, operating on the mindset of “BECAUSE I C-A-N!!! Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…
He Had Raped the Woman in front of the Clerk, the Other Customers, Ran Off for Three Hours, Then Returned to the Shop to Burglarize the Shop, the Police Used the Pepper Spray and Subdued Him
The thirty-seven-year-old Lee in the midnight hours of two nights ago, went to a super convenience shop to hit on a woman, she’d turned him down, he’d not cared that there was a female store clerk, or a male customer in the shop, ripped off the woman’s clothes, and raped her with his fingers; the female clerk called the police, the male customer shouted at him, Lee escaped, and three hours later, he’d returned back to the shop to burglarize the place, was caught by the police ambushing there for him, charged with obstruction of sexual freedom, the D.A. asked the courts to have him into custody which the courts signed off on.
The police investigated, that Lee was unemployed, at around two in the morn two days ago, he’d gone to shop at this local super convenience store at Fengshan, he saw the victim sitting alone at the seating area, walked up to her to get her number, the woman didn’t know Lee and told him she wasn’t going to give him her number, Lee got angered, started pulling at the woman’s clothes, her pants, was brute toward her.
There was a female cashier working at the shop, also another male customer there, the female cashier saw Lee pulling the victim, turned to call the police, Lee didn’t care, dragged the woman to the side, and, raped her with his hands. As the male customer saw, he’d gone up to stop him, told him to back off the woman, that was when Lee ran out.
The police rushed over, collected the evidence, took the victim to the hospital, at around five, Lee returned back to the same store to steal, and the female clerk who was at the shop when Lee attacked the woman was at the station giving her statements, the store was watched by the store manager, he’d made
Lee by his form, his clothes, and reported to the police in secret. The police rushed over, and as the officers went to get him, Lee fought, injured an officer on the face causing him contusions, the other officers used pepper spray to subdue Lee.
During the interrogations, Lee denied ALL allegations of sexual assault, refused to answer any inquiries the D.A. has for him regarding what had happened, the D.A. used the surveillance and the hidden camera angles imaged, and the identifications from the victim, believed that Lee is a suspect, charged him on obstruction of sexual freedoms, obstruction of police business, theft, and other crimes, the courts signed off on his being taken into custody yesterday. And so, this is still, another case of “because I CAN!”, because this LOSER thought he could rape the woman, just because he felt like it, and this still just showed, how you losers are driven by your urges, and you can’t control yourselves, and the woman was just sitting there, and as he’d hit on her, she’d told him she wasn’t interested, and he got angered, and raped her.
The Repeated Sex Offender’s Lost His Case Against How the Department of Corrections Tossing His Parole
I got a question: how did a SEX offender MAKE the parole board again in the first place??? Yeah, and his claims were justifiably, tossed all right! Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…
The inmate of Taipei Penitentiary, Hsu filed for parole, but eight of his reviewing committee all voted against it, he’d filed a suit, claiming that the evaluation of the paroles of the inmates is, problematic, that the department of corrections is uncertain of their ability to reform the inmates, and asked the review be tossed, and be given parole; the Taoyuan District Court investigated, that Hsu is a repeated rapist who’d forced the victims to get their nude photos taken by him, that he’d not settled with his victims, and not gone to the therapy sessions mandated by the courts and the correctional facilities, found that the corrections department isn’t faulty in tossing his asking, Hsu lost the case.
Hsu had been sentenced to four years eight months on assault, obstruction of freedom, and obstruction of secret, etc., etc., sentenced to four years eight months by the courts, started serving in June of 2019, last year, he’d served half of his prison term, and became, eligible for parole, but, as the parole board evaluated last November, the eight members of the committed voted against his parole, it’d dissatisfied him.
The courts found, that in September of 2009, Hsu used the claims of working as a photographer, stolen the models’ assets, and, in October of the same year, he’d sexually molested two women against their wills in a motel, he’d served his time, but not gone to court mandated treatment therapy sessions, in May of 2016, he’d sexually assaulted a woman, and, took her nude photos against her will, to, threaten her to have sex with him again.
Hsu claimed, that the parole board did NOT specify the dates of the parole board hearings, and not given him a chance to plead his case with the committee members of the board, and tossed his parole asking on his priors, his criminal offense, and the payments to his victims, that it was not by the ratios, that there’s no justification for that, and the prison system used his past behaviors to decide on how he become reformed from serving his time, that it was the prison systems’ lacking in confidence in their own work.
The Department of Corrections rebutted, that to meet the parole requirements, other than having to serve a set term, there’s the considerations of the crimes committed, the criminal records, and the behaviors in prison, and the efficacy of being reformed by the correctional facilities to be considered, that everything was by the book.
The courts investigated, that the Taipei Penitentiary’s parole board evaluation had gone by the books, and allowed Hsu to state his case, considering how Hsu had committed the crimes of forced sexual intercourse, forced molestation, robbery, encroachment, and other crimes, that his criminal actions are multivariate, that there’s an increased chance of him, impacting the safety of the society, that the eight members of the parole board agreed unanimously, that the contents wasn’t out of accordance with the law, there was no flaw in ruling.
And so, this is how, this LOSER didn’t GET out, thank god (uh, as if!), as it would be, impossible, to reform a sex offender, and, the parole board saw his tricks, and, not allowed him to make parole, thus, keeping the society safe, for one more day.
The Court Judge Who’d Filmed His Coworker without Her Consent Got Stripped of His Status of Court Justice, Fought for an Appeal, His Appeal Was Tossed
The judge knowingly, invaded his coworker’s, privacy, getting too nosy, and, it got his judgeship, stripped! Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…
The criminal court justice of Taoyuan, Tsai suspected that his female coworker who’d shared the same office was having an extramarital affair, captured her computer screen conversations, and the photos of intimacies she had on her computer and reported to the head of the courts, in the end, it was, a, misunderstanding; Tseng pressed charges on Tsai, and Tsai was sentenced to five months on obstruction of secret, and invasion of privacy; the duties courts found, that Tsai had lost his credibility to the public, suspended him, and terminate the hiring of him as a court justice for two whole years, Tsai fought for an appeal, and his appeal, tossed.
The court judge, Tseng’s family, due to the needs of the medical sorts, Tsai introduced the court official, Wu who’s famous in the medical field, to help connect her, Tsai didn’t know both Wu and Tseng had been divorced, during May of 2020, in the office, Tsai saw the dialogue box popping up in Tseng’s computer with Wu calling her, “honey”, and sent her the photos of their getting close to each other.
As Tsai was shocked, he’d misbelieved, that Tseng was having an affair, and took the shots of the computer screen, and told the head of courts. The man called Tseng into questioning, and, confirmed, that there was NO name in the spouse column of her identification card, and told the findings to Tsai, but Tsai still didn’t believe it, and decided to collect more evidence.
The duties courts found, that Tsai only wanted to prove his own personal doubts, and prodded into Tseng’s privacy that he’d, gone against the righteous characters of a court judge, that he’d done something severe, that he deserves to be punished severely.
Tsai originally did okay in his work as a court justice, after he’d committed the crimes, he’d claimed that his mistakes were of the personal sorts, that he’d offended Tseng in another personal matter, that she was getting him back, that’s why she’d sued him, the duties courts believed, that Tsai couldn’t introspect, and had lost credibility of the public, to work in the justice department, terminated his contract for hire for two years.
And so, this is on the importance of MYOB! I mean, even IF the woman in your office WAS having an affair, that’s her problem, not yours, and yet, you’d gotten, too nosy, stuck your nose into someone else’s business, invaded her privacy, and you’re a court judge like she is too, and, you knew the laws on privacy and yet, you’d still, broken the law, and, the rulings of the man not being hired in the court systems for only TWO years is still too light a punishment here.
And no, there’s no, “extra life” given as a “bonus” either!
Game over, in the, marriage, so, just sign the papers, why don’t you! Let’s not make this SHIT uglier than it already became.
Game over, in the, marriage, and there’s, nothing we can do ‘bout it, we can’t, shock this already DEAD and gone (not to mention, flatlined for more than, a whole DECADE!) marriage of ours, back to life, besides, the kids are already grown, I know they can damn well, handle mommy and daddy getting their divorce.
Game over, in the, marriage, and, we both lost, because, this is, a no-win situation, don’t matter who wins the case, we still, both, lost.
It just amazes me, how we were, able to, drag this SHIT out this long, well, guess, that the kids are, the primary motives for me to stay in the marriage, I mean, I had to make sure, that they’re, adults (18???) that they have the skills they need to live, that they no longer, needed me, and they’d become, very independent on their own.
It’s like in that video game we used to play together (yeah uh, still don’t play those!), how the two of you had, battled out the bad guys together as a team, then, somewhere along the way (in that game!), we’d, gone on, our, separate trips, I found my pursuits of what’s important to me, and you found what was, vital to your, wellbeing, and we became, separated.
And this is still, a “no-fault divorce” as neither one of us had done anything wrong to betray the other, and so, for the reason (and there MUST be one, as mandated by the courts, right???) we put down, “Irreconcilable Differences”, but, it’d made me wonder: what the HECK happened to us, to make all our differences, irreconcilable? Is it the little things in life, how you’d never lift up the toilet seat (go do your business outside, Mr.!), how I always, hogged the quilt at night (Yeah, am aware of doing that!), what is it, that’s, broken us, to beyond, repair? Or, were we never right, to begin with, but we just, failed to end this SHIT, and dragged both our miserable lives out in this too long?