On how moral responsibilities starts from the heads of these universities, the presidents, the deans of these, schools, then extend down to the students…off of the Front Page Sections, translated…
The president of University of Pennsylvania, Magill, in her testimonies, painted over the anti-Sematic speeches, causing the debates, which led to her resignation, showed, the complex struggle of how the universities are caught between protecting the students and freedom of speech, her resignation is due to the public’s unsettlement of the rising anti-Sematic air, along with the hostility that’s in the school’s getting ignored by the management of the university.
Magill, and the presidents of Harvard, M.I.T. recently testified at the American Congress, on the management of the university campuses, and the anti-Sematic slurs. The Republican congressmen inquired, “is the call of Holocaust a violation of the behavioral principle of the university? The presidents responded using the legal wordings, that there needed to be physical actions from the racial slurs, for it to be, punishable.
And their responses had caused anger in the donors, governors, senators, and the Jewish communities too, especially toward Magill, due to her lenience toward anti-Sematic believes, the school lost a hundred million dollars in donations from the sponsors, the board of trustees are now looking for a new president for U of Pennsylvania, and, Magill had, resigned from her position in a few short, day’s time.
The core of the problem, is that a lot of the Jewish students now feel, unsafe, and the groups in the school called out the anti-Jews mottos, the professors were advocating genocide, and the constant coming on of death threats, making the Jewish students hide. The critics blamed the higher up officials of the school for turning away the students who had been, discriminated against, to prioritize the needs of the persecutors, instead of the, victims.
The culture of these university campuses reminded me of Germany in 1930, at the time, anti-Semitism had been normalized in the younger generations of people, then, turned into the ideology of which the country is, governed under, allowing the rising up of Hitler. Legally, the offensive speech are protected, unless there’s physical threats, the schools would need to weigh closely, if they are to punish the students who’d spoken these, racial, slurs. But, to balance between the delicate relationship of preventing harassment and civic freedom, we would need to consider it in the means of the moment which these instances had, occurred, and the universities are now, admitting, that they’d, failed in the balancing of this matter.
The focal point of the presidents’ arguments lies in the protecting of the First Amendment rights, other than the physical threats, the freedom of speech is, protected. But, in doing so, the presidents seem to have no empathy of the Jewish students who are, in the midst of this atmosphere.
So, what lessons can we learn, from this? First, the schools had yet to resolve the issues of tolerance, safety, and the various ideologies that existed; the presidents’ resigning, may satisfy those who’d, criticized the behaviors, the handling of this matter, needed the weighing in of the complexity of the debates and issues. Secondly, education should act as an prevention in discrimination, the universities need to teach the students of the lessons in history, and the values of humanitarianism. Thirdly, with the empathies and the cohesiveness of the local communities, this is way more important, than the written-in-stone policies, empathy is what will get us past, the hatred.
This debate, showed just how difficult it is, to balance between the welfare of the students, and freedom of speech, and whether or not this can be, successful, it relies on how to reach that delicate state of balance between freedom and safety, stereotypes and tolerance. Through courage and wisdom, the universities can help overcome the hatred.
And this showed, the importance of the roles of these higher ed facilities, in that it’s a place, where the right sorts of values should be, instilled into, the students’ minds, but, the key here, is that you would need a just, a morally responsible, president, and board of trustees, because if these heads can’t even act morally responsible, then, how would the professors, the deans, even the students who operate under them, have the right kinds of examples to look up to, to act right?
You must be logged in to post a comment.