Category Archives: sexual misconducts

He’d Received the Message, “a Horny Dog in Love with a Shrew”, Sent the Porn Back as a Reply to a Woman He Met Online, the Elderly in His Seventies Found by the Verdict to Pay the Woman $10,000N.T.s

Sexting here, and you still get, SUED!  Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

The seventy-year-old elderly man, Tsai sent the porn footage to a female he met online, was sued for sexual harassment, and the woman sued him for $200,000N.T.s, he’d said he was innocent, that it was the woman, sending the footage of the dog humping the female owner to him, which misled him.  The judge found, that the footages were sent and received in the time of two-months, and, in the dialogues, it was difficult, to confirm, that the woman was hinting at sex, the courts mandated that Tsai needed to pay the woman $10,000N.T.s; both the elderly and the D.A. filed for the appeals, the district court in Kaohsiung believed, that Tsai the elderly had, damaged the woman’s dignity, and still mandated that he pays the woman $10,000N.T.s.

The verdict pointed out, that Tsai and the woman met online, added one another to LINE and started chatting from time to time, sending one another the greetings; in January of two years ago, the woman sent a footage, “The horny dog in love with the shrew” to Tsai, with the dog, humping the female owner’s legs, two months later, Tsai also sent the three segments of pornography he’d downloaded to the woman.

The woman felt that Tsai was sexually harassing her, called the cops, and pressed charges, and sued him for $20,000N.T.s.  During the trial of the simplified court of Fengshan, Tsai said that it wasn’t what it looked like, that Tsai had asked him to go to a motel, and told him that the cost was $2,000N.T.s, back then, he’d not made the “date”; later the woman sent him the footage of “the horny dog in love with the shrew”, that was why he’d, responded by sending the porn footages back to her; he said, that sending and receiving the videos is the culture of the online interactions, that the contents of what he’d sent wasn’t really sexually illicit, that it’d not constitute as sexual harassment.

The judge reviewed over the conversation records, and noted how two months after the woman sent Tsai the footage, did Tsai send the three segments of porn to her, that during the time, there were the only ordinary greetings of “Good morning”, “how are you” exchanged between the two, that it was hard to confirm, that the footages sent by the elderly has anything to do with what the woman sent to him, from two months ago.

The judge believed, that Tsai is with enough experiences of life, that he should know, that the footages he’d sent to the woman, would cause her disgust, or thrills, that his behaviors was sexual harassment, and, considering the finances of both, mandated that Tsai needed to pay the woman $10,000N.T.s.  Tsai still denied the sexual harassment charges, while the woman felt that the money the courts fined Tsai to pay to her wasn’t quite enough, both filed for appeals.

The district court of Kaohsiung found, that the two had never met physically, that their interactions revolved around “greetings toward elderly”, and that the woman told Tsai, that she was seeing someone else, that it wasn’t like Tsai stated, that they were, dating, didn’t believe Tsai’s claims, and found that Tsai needed to pay the woman $10,000N.T.s, as for the asking of the woman in payment, the original trial already specified the basis for it, tossed back her appeal.

And so, this is how, these online interactions, can get people the wrong ideas, and besides, you should NEVER be sexting other people, because, most of us here (still just, assuming, and yet, I’m still, NO ASShole!), would take it as something OFFENSIVE, so, just don’t do it!  Otherwise, you get SUED for sexual harassment.

Leave a comment

Filed under Awareness, Knowing the Law and Breaking It, Life, On the Wrong Side of the Law, Online Relationships, Perspectives, Properties of Life, Sex Sells, sexual misconducts, Solicitations, White Picket Fence

Only Sent the Nude Photos to One Other Person, Lin Got His Charges Dropped for Another Case

Yeah, so it’s punishable by “quantity”, instead of, “quality” then?  That makes it, a whole lot better, that he’d, only, passed the nude photo of his own ex-girlfriend, the legislator, Kao to one other person…are you, FUCKING (don’t pardon me here!) shitting me???  Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

Lin, due to the case of abuse of the legislator, Kao was indicted on eight counts, the case is currently pending trial at the Hsinbei District Court, Kao also sued him for public indecency for passing the photo of one of his ex-girlfriends online, the Hsinbei District Court believed, that Lin only sent the photo to one other friend, that there was no intention of passing the photos out online, dropped the charges.

Kao, the legislator told her representing attorney, Lee, that the district attorney’s office was unreasonable in the case, that if based off of the fact, that the photos were sent to only one other person, it doesn’t constitute as spreading the sexually-illicit materials around, then, all the cases of the nude photos gone viral will not make the charges of “spreading of sexually-illicit photographs”, “this does NOT match to the morale of this country’s laws.”

Because of Lin’s physical violence toward Kao, he was charged with forgery, obstruction of secret, unlawful custody, forced act, defamation, obstruction of computer uses, assault, threats, a total of, eight charges.  The Hsinbei D.A.’s Office found him suspicious of all eight, that there’s proof that he may collaborate his statements, that he will repeatedly offend, on the twenty-first, kept him in police custody for two more months.

Kao found then, that other than her own sexually-illicit photos, Lin also had the sexually-illicit photos of his exes, that Lin used the communication apps to pass the photos to others he knew, she’d reported to the Hsinbei D.A.’s Office, that Lin was in suspicion of spreading and possession of lewd photos and footages.

Lin claimed this was slanderous, that the photos he received were from the women themselves, that back then, his friend, Lee mentioned how he shared private things of his wife, that was why he’d sent the lewd photos to Lee, that he’d not sent them to anybody else.

And, the district attorneys confirmed that the photos were sent to only Lee by Lin, that there were, no other recipients, that it’d not constitute as “spreading the lewd materials”, that there’s no reasonable doubt, that Lin had committed this crime, dropped the charges.

The attorney, Liu found, that the D.A. viewed this case from a practical and traditional means, and, the penal codes of this particular law was to protect the good in society, not on the invasions of privacy.  The attorney Lin interpreted, even if it’s just one on one, sending the lewd materials to three or more, it constitutes as public indecency.

Lee believed, that whether or not there’s an intention, only the individuals know, that legally, there are, only, the objective review of evidence, Lin admitted having the sexually illicit footages, and admitting to sending it to one other person, “doesn’t that constitutes as intentionally spreading and possession” then?

So, this, is on how the various attorneys interpreted the matter of this loser’s (b/c that is what he is!) behaviors of sharing the sexually illicit photos with his pals, and it don’t matter how many other persons you shared these photos of intimacies with, even if it’s just to brag to your best friend on hey, I had this one, it’s still against the law, but, the laws are defined, too, loosely here, with NO specification of the exact words of what constitutes as legal or not, that’s why, there are still these holes, that the defense will drill into, to help the individuals who hired them to get off easy.

And the law here, still doesn’t do SHIT for the invasions of privacy, to protect those individuals who shot their own nudes to send to the people they’re in love with, and these people are, just, way too, mother @#$%ING (maxed out!), stupid to boot too.

Leave a comment

Filed under Abuse, Abuser/Enabler Interaction Style, Crime & Punishment, Immoral Behaviors, Invasion of Privacy, Messed Up Values, sexual misconducts, Slaps on the Wrist, Utilizing the Internet, Violence Against Members of Opposite Sex, Wake Up Calls, White Picket Fence

He’d Falsified Himself as a Woman, and Successful Scammed Two Men to Sleep with Him, Raped His Victims a Total of Thirteen Times

There are still, NO “victims” in this, “equation” only ABUSER AND, ENABLER!!!  Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

A man, Lin falsified himself as a woman, logged onto the friendship software, started dating two men, and, gotten the two male victims to his residence, used the sleeping pills to put them out, turn off the lights in the room, then, went into the room, to have sex with the men; one of the victims was a virgin, and didn’t have a clue, that he’d “lost his virginity” twelve times, the other man, after once, felt something wasn’t right, and immediately notified the police; the courts criticized Lin for fulfilling his own urges, disregarding his victims’ wills, raped them, causing the victims to get traumatized, showed no remorse after the crimes, sentenced him to four years six months on sexual assault.  This can be appealed.

The police and the district attorneys investigated, that Lin had been sent to prison on robbery charges before, he’d taken up the falsified identity of “Yu-Jie Lin” online, and met the nineteen year-old male, A, on the evening of March 26th, 2020, Lin falsified himself as “Yu-Jie Lin’s” older brother, taking the victim back to his own stay by scooter, added the sleeping pills into the alcohol he’d served to the victim, turned off the lights and waited, then, used his falsified identity of “Yu-Jie Lin”, went into the room, to have SEX with his victim, after he was done, raping his victim, he’d, left the room, without showing his face.

As victim A finally woke, Lin made the excuse of his “sister” being out already, but as victim A went home, he’d found fecal matter on his penis, and texted “Yu-Jie Lin” about it, Lin slurred through the matter, and victim A went to get a urine test at the hospital and found sleeping pill inside his urine, then, called the police.

As the police looked into the matter, they’d found another man, B, age twenty-four, who was also, a victim too, before B was raped, he had no prior experience of sexual intercourse, and was scammed by the same measures, and he’d insisted that “Yu-Jie Lin” was a woman, and from February to May of the year, he’d had sex as many as twelve times, and never once thought, that it was, a man whom he was, having sex with, and, in the chats, they’d started, referring to one another like they were dating couples.

As Lin turned himself into the police station, he’d admitted to taking the two victim males home, but denied the sexual intercourses, claimed that he’d only, carried on in conversation with both males the entire night.  The courts criticized Lin, that knowing the two victims had NO intentions of having se with him, but, disregarded the rights to their bodies, causing the victims to get traumatized, and denied what he’d done throughout, not mentioned of paying his victims, with no signs of remorse.

The courts considered, that Lin committed thirteen counts of forced sexual acts, but, used the same measures, in a short period of time, that there’s the responsibilities of his wrongdoing on himself, gave him four years six months for these counts; the drugging his victims, due to insufficient evidence that it’d affected victim A’s will to have sexual intercourse, and the medications were Lin’s by prescriptions by a hospital, he got off on that count.

And so, this still just showed, how FUCKING (no need to pardon me here!) these younger generations of males are, and, it also showed, how modern day people relied too much on the interactions online, and how easily they get, fooled, and this is still, not good, the perp was wrong, but, the “victims” aren’t, right either, they’re all, way too, STUPID!

Leave a comment

Filed under Abuser/Enabler Interaction Style, Abusing Someone's Trust, Cost of Living, Knowing the Law and Breaking It, On the Wrong Side of the Law, Online Relationships, Sex Sells, Sexual Assaults, sexual misconducts, Stupidity, White Picket Fence

He’d Taken Advantage of the Young Daughter His Friend Asked Him to Help Take Care of, Sentenced to Eight Years

Another RAPE, molestation, of WHATEVER of a young child here, and she was entrusted to someone the parents trusted too, on how this LOSER still just got a slap on the wrist, because the parents settled with him, off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

A male substitute of a certain elementary school in Yunlin was asked by his friend to look after some children, he’d taken photos of the three young girls’ pubic region, and send the photos to the Clouds online, and he’d rubbed up against one of the young girls with his pubic area too, the Criminal Investigations Unit received the Missing Children’s Network in the U.S.’s tip, and caught him.  The Tainan High Subsidiary Courts found, that he’d not cared of the young girl’s psychological development, sentenced him to eight years on counts of children and youth sex extortion, and other charges; this can still be appealed.

The verdict stated, that the thirty-six year old Liu works as a substitute in two of Yunlin’s elementary schools, as a counselor of a preschool too, in December of 2017, a friend of his asked him to pick her seven-year-old daughter up from school, he’d taken the girl back to his place, while the child was napping, he’d taken shots of her pubic area, and uploaded the files to Google Cloud;  two years ago in November and in February of last year, he was asked by another friend to take his six and two year-old children back to his home, and while the young children were playing with toys, he’d taken shots of their pubic regions, then, uploaded it to Cloud, and had twice touched the two-year-old young girl’s pubic area twice.

The American National Association for Missing and Exploited Children found the children’s photos on Cloud, notified the criminal investigations unit here last February, the police searched, and in March, they’d found Liu out, and confiscated the related images, the hard drives he’d used to store the images, after the case had busted open, Liu was suspended from his work, and fired.

The first trial based off of how Liu broke the laws of child and adolescent protections, sentenced him to ten years, he’d appealed, admitted that he took advantage of when the seven-year-old being napping, and took the shots, while he took the shot of the six-year-old, it was a spur of the moment thing, that he’d not done anything against her will, and he’d not rubbed his own penis up against the two-year-old’s pubic area either.

The Tainan High Courts fund that Liu had shot the three young girls’ pubic areas, and rubbed up against the two-year-old’s pubic area, that there’s no need for actual penetration for the charges of rape to stick; as a school instructor, he’d gained the trusts of the parents, and disregarded how his behaviors may impact the young girls’ psychological wellbeing for the sake of his own desires, considering how he’d agreed on the settlement amount with the victimized children’s parents, he was sentenced to only eight years on breaking the laws of child protection, and the obstruction of privacy.

This is still bullshit, just because you’d reached a settlement agreement with the victims’ parents, that still doesn’t mean that you should get off easy, after all, these sex offenders, are known to repeatedly offend again, and I’m sure, that after this bad teacher gets out of his jail terms, he will return back to being a predator, making the world even less safe for the next generations of children.

Leave a comment

Filed under Abuse, Abusing Someone's Trust, Crime & Punishment, Innocence Lost, Knowing the Law and Breaking It, On the Wrong Side of the Law, Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime, Rapes, Reforming a Sexual Predator, Sexual Assaults, sexual misconducts, White Picket Fence

Sold the DeepFake Video Footages from Online, Made Millions of Dollars Illegally, Yu Indicted on Three Counts

Taking cyber sex crimes, one more step, farther, with the DeepFake app here, off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

There were 119 Victims, the A.I. Deepfake Technologies were Abused in Areas of Sexual Cyberbullying, and the Calls of Amendments to Protect Came About as Well

The famous YouTuber, “Yu”, Yu-Cheng Chu used the Deepfake technologies to make the porns, and sold them off online, switched the faces of famous female actresses, the YouTubers, politicians too, onto the bodies of the porn stars, there were 119 victims so far.  The Hsinbei D.A.’s office charged Chu and her male assistant, Chuang on charges of public indecency, slander, and breaking the laws on personal data protection, suggested to the courts to confiscate the total earnings of $13.38 million N.T.s they’d made illegally; the YouTuber, “Smiley”, the woman, Ye, had been dropped from the charges due to lack of evidence.

The D.A. found, that Chu and Chuang, for their own private means, abused the techniques of A.I. made the fake photos of women up, produced the hard-to-tell real videos of sexually illicit means, and shared the videos online, that it’s caused irreparable damages to the victims, and had gone online to poll the public who they wanted to see, objectifying women, causing sexual violence online, as well as cyberbullying, that the damages they’d done were, enormous, beyond calculations, and, considering how both admitted to wrongdoing, the D.A.’s Office had asked the courts to give them the sentences they deserve.

The Deepfake case, brought out the amendments of the laws against cyberbullying.  On the tenth, the Executive Department passed the amendment of the obstruction of sexual privacy and the falsified images, producing of spreading the sexually illicit images of another that were false, with the heaviest sentence of five years and if the perpetrators attempted to make money, then, the heaviest sentences would be increased to seven years.

The head of justice department, Tsai told, that the amendments were to protect the rights of the victims’ privacy, that members of the public should NOT, without the consents, film or spread the sexually illicit images of other people, and reiterated that the members of the public need to be on the alert, to know if the footages were Deepfake, to not produce, nor spread the false videos, to protect the privacies and the rights of others, to make the online world, safer.

the DeepFake programs, someone else’s body with your face, or your body with someone else’s, face…photo from online

The police and D.A. found, that Chu in July two years ago, started up the Twitter Fans page of “Taiwan YouTuber Face-Off”, later changed the name of the group to “Taiwan YouTube Sensation Videos Synthesis”, recruited the members of the online community to get into the Telegram group, with the charges of eight hundred dollars per member gaining the regular memberships, that they can watch the footages, upgrading to VIP with paying for $1,900N.T. in membership, the individuals can watch the long films, and attracted 4,500 individual to get the memberships.

Chuang first downloaded the images of the victims to start of, then, Chu cut off the face using internet, switched the faces to the sexually illicit footages, the victims included the Taipei City’s legislator, Kao, the city councilwoman, Huang, the Taipei City Spokeswoman, Huang, a total of 119 victims, of these eighty-three had pursued their cases on the criminal fronts.

Last October, the Detective Agency last October took Chu and two others into custody.  Chu and Chuang admitted to the crimes, claimed “it was fun, and it gets the volumes of the visitors to the website higher”; Chu’s girlfriend, Ye, denied her involvement, claimed that she cohabited with him, but they had separate rooms to work in, that she was unclear of what he made, Chu also claimed that he’d not told his girlfriend either.

And so this, is how the “face-off” technologies, exacerbated the cyber sex trade, because, there’s, no way any of us can prevent someone else from taking our headshots, that’s why this is an easy crime to commit, and, even if these perps were caught, there’s no telling how far these, falsified sex photos of our heads, with naked bodies that aren’t ours to begin with, got to, and there’s the need for an even harsher punishment for these sorts of crimes, slaps on the wrists will, no longer do, as this will, become, the primary means that crimes are committed now, with everything getting, exchanged from online, any one of us can be targets.

Leave a comment

Filed under Abuser/Enabler Interaction Style, Cyber-Bullying, Improper Misconducts, Invasion of Privacy, Knowing the Law and Breaking It, On the Wrong Side of the Law, sexual misconducts, Utilizing the Internet

Assaulting the Two Workers in the Justice Department Three Times on Their Buttocks, the Man Sentenced to Pay $150,000N.T.

This loser should get some HARD time in prison, that’ll teach him, as he becomes, someone ELSE’s, BITCH in prison, but instead, he only got fines instead!  Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

Peng was asked along to repossess a property, during the time, he took advantage, patted down the female court official’s and the female court secretary’s buttocks, was sued for sexual harassment, he’d used the excuse of how he’d not found the women reactive toward his patting their buttocks as lacking of proof, denied the accusations; the courts believed, that because the two women were working, that’s why they’d, not made a scene, that they had no need to blankly accuse Peng afterwards either, and, believed that Peng had, sexually harassed the two women, sentenced him to six months in prison.  And, the two women filed for the civil claims, the Fengshan Simplified Court based off of the occurrence of the female court official being physically harassed once, the female secretary twice, sentenced Peng to pay the women $50,000N.T. and $100,000N.T. respectively.

The verdict stated, that at 2:28 in the afternoon on May 29th, 2019, the female secretary and female court official went to a foreclosure sight at a building in Fengshan District, Kaohsiung, Wu was asked by the owner, led the officials of the courts in.

As Peng opened the door for the three, while the female court secretary passed through the gates, he’d patted her right buttocks once.  As they’d exited the elevators, the female court official turned side ways for Peng to ring the doorbell, and he’d reached to pat down the right buttocks of the court official, as the female secretary was writing the records, he’d, reached for her buttocks again.

The female secretary and court official, due to how they’re on call, they’d kept silent, and reported the matter to the superior, and the following day, they’d both gone to the police station to report; during the trial, Peng made the excuse of how it may have been his backpack that brushed against the backside of the female court official, that was how she could misconstrue it as sexual harassment.  That the surveillance footage the police received were illegally obtained, so there’s no evidential proof.

But the justice based off of the video footage, believed that the words the court secretary and the court official stated were truths, and, sentenced Peng on two counts of breaking the laws against sexual harassment, gave him four months, and he should serve for a six months, but he could pay his way out of serving the time.

The two also sued Peng in civil courts, demanded that he paid them $100,000N.T. each.  Peng still claimed he’d not patted them, that if he had, sexually harassed them, how come they weren’t surprised.  The judge believed, that normally, the victims may not in the time being, verbalize aloud for the perpetrator to stop, that the two women may have prioritized their work duties, that’s why they’d, hidden it so well, that it was considered normal how they’d, both reacted, and, found that Peng needed to pay the official of the court $50,000N.T. for patting her buttocks once, and the secretary $100,000N.T. twice.

And, yeah, what does that do?  What do you think this teaches losers, the next time they attempt to pat us women down, and they will?  Oh yeah, that they get to, PAY an amount to the victims, and that was that, that they will only, get the slaps on the wrists, for the bad behaviors of continual sexually harassing us women.  That, is what this “punishment” is teaching the public here.

Leave a comment

Filed under Crime & Punishment, In the Workplace, Knowing the Law and Breaking It, Life, On the Wrong Side of the Law, Properties of Life, Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime, sexual misconducts, Slaps on the Wrist, White Picket Fence

The Predatory Instructor Enticed the Adolescent Girls to Pose Nude & Raped Them, Sentenced to a Heavy Twenty-Five Years

Do you, parents, feel safe, with a predator like this, posing as a schoolteacher, in your children’s, schools???  I wouldn’t imagine so!  This is still, an abuser/enabler interaction style that’s presented here, in this case, off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

An office manager of an unnamed cram school in the southern parts, Lee had enticed the middle, high school age girls to pose nude for him, then, threatened every one of them that he’ll send the photos all over, to coerce the victims to have sexual intercourse, there were at least, eleven school age girls who’d been found as victims, the police search found, close to 600 nude photos in the man’s possessions, there were victims who’d told, that they’d been controlled by Lee for five whole years, the courts grilled Lee for using the girls as tools that he could use at any time, sentenced him to a harsh twenty-five years.

Since 2015, Lee had falsified himself as a woman on FB, and randomly found multiple middle and high school age girls, sent the private messages, claimed that he was looking for underwear models, and had the victims take shots on themselves in only their underwear, or nude, that he will pay them, there were, eleven found adolescent female victims, who’d sent anywhere from fifteen to seventy-one nudes to Lee.

There were the teenage girls who’d found Lee’s demands improper, and wanted out, then Lee used a dummy account, and threatened to spread the nude photos of his victims online, to get the adolescents to send him photos every single day, and the victim had, complied, and, from her middle school into her high school years, sent a total of close to six hundred shots or videos, and wired over $110,000N.T. to Lee.

In 2017, Lee met another high school age girl out, claimed that he was looking for model to pose in underwear, but, forcibly took the adolescent girl to a motel, and threatened her, “you have to strip for me, allow me to take your nude photos, then I will pay you”, forced to take her shots nude, and, molested her; the police received multiple calls of adolescent girls, and back in 2020, Lee was finally caught in Kaohsiung.

During the trial, Lee denied the allegations, claimed that he didn’t know that his victims were underage, but had mentioned to them that he was looking for models, that the photos they’d sent him will need to get reviewed first; the victimized adolescent female claimed, that Lee had started connecting with her since her first year of middle school, and threatened to go viral with the nudes she’d sent him, that she’d been under Lee’s control for as long as five whole years to date.

Lee had even threatened the young woman, “I think, I should, go public with your name and personal information then”, the young girl, out of fear, continued to send her nude photos to him, and continued wiring the money to him, the courts found, that the adolescent girl was coerced, and feared what Lee may do, that was why she kept sending him the photos.

The judge considered that Lee is over thirty years of age, and can tell right from wrong, and had used these girls for his own personal sexual pleasures long-term, controlled them, and the victims’ ages ranged from elementary school to high school, and after he was caught, he’d evaded responsibilities, continued damaging these adolescent girls’ lives, forced them to continue producing the sexually-illicit images, molesting them, found him guilty on five charges, gave him a heavy sentence of twenty-five years.

So, are there, victims here?  Or, is this still, an abuser/enabler relationship interaction style?  I mean, these young girls (too dumb, and inexperienced of the world!!!) should’ve told an adult they trusted in their lives, or called the cops, but, because this man preyed on their fears, and all of these, victims (or enablers, whichever you see as fitting calling them!), all allowed him to take advantage of them, that’s why, this LOSER was able to, do this SHIT, for as long as he had, and now, he got twenty-five years behind bars.  But that’s still, nowhere NEAR quite enough, to repair for the damages of these innocent, naïve, school-age girls’, lives, is it?  Nowhere NEAR, close!

1 Comment

Filed under Abuse, Abuser/Enabler Interaction Style, Abusing Someone's Trust, Being Exposed, Crime & Punishment, Innocence Lost, Knowing the Law and Breaking It, On the Wrong Side of the Law, Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime, Re-Experiencing the Trauma, Sex Sells, sexual misconducts, Violence Against Members of Opposite Sex, White Picket Fence

The Retired School Instructor Found His Way into His Friend’s Daughter’s Bedroom and Molested Her in Her Sleep

And this is still because???  Oh yeah, all you, mother FUCKERS (don’t pardon me here!) still can’t keep your DICKS inside your, FUCKING pants!  Sexual misconduct, and he did it, to the daughter of a friend too!  A SEX CRIME, by, opportunity, off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

A retired male instructor from Taoyuan gave his friend’s middle school age daughter afterschool help, but used the time that the adolescent stayed at his home during the two nights, snuck into the bedroom, and, started molesting her sexually, the young woman woke from her sleep, not known how to react, and, took a peep, and saw it was her tutor, she’d kept everything silent until she finally broken down, and told of the experiences of enduring through the sexual molestation, that she’d felt very fearful, and disgusted as it’d happened to her; and recently, the district attorney’s office charged this predatory instructor on opportune sexual molestation, asked the courts to punish him severely, based off of the laws set to protect children and adolescents.

The investigators found, that the male instructor and the mother of the adolescent met in church, and because the woman trusted the individual, that was why she’d sent her daughter into his home weekly for the tutoring sessions, in 2019, the adolescent’s mother needed to stay at the hospital with a family member, left her daughter to the tutor’s care for two days.

And the male instructor made his way into the bedroom of the teen in the middle of the nights, and put his hand down into her underwear and bras, and molested her, the adolescent woke from having been touched, not known how to react, and can only keep everything in, and yet, for the two nights that followed, the man came continually, and she was physically assaulted on her breasts and in her pubic area, more than dozens of times.

Six months later, the adolescent felt upset, and went to her school counselor’s office and disclosed to the school counselor what had happened to her, and in the company of her own family she’d gone to the police; during the interrogations, the tutor only admitted to offering the tutoring sessions, and allowed the adolescent girl to stay with him a few days and, denied ALL allegations of sexual molestation.

The adolescent accused, that when she was being molested, she was awakened, she’d closed her eyes a bit to pretend that she was still asleep, and opened her eyes for a bit, to confirm that it was her tutor who was molesting her.  The D.A. confirmed, that the defendant took the time when the victims was asleep, to molest her, that it’s opportunistic molestation by subjectivity, and objectively, he was guilty of forced molestation charges, and, based off of the principles of the laws of “knowing and doing”, the district attorney’s found that the tutor was responsible for opportune sexual molestation.

And so, this woman wrongfully trusted this man, and placed her teenage daughter in his home, and this young woman was sexually molested, by someone who goes to the same church as her own mother, and what does that tell us about those who go to church again?  Oh yeah, some of them are still, SATANS in god’s skin, masking themselves up, waiting for opportunities like these, to hurt others.

Leave a comment

Filed under Abuse, Abuse of Power, Abusing Someone's Trust, Carelessness of Adults, Crime & Punishment, Improper Behaviors of an Adult, Improper Behaviors of School Instructors, Improper Misconducts, Knowing the Law and Breaking It, On the Wrong Side of the Law, Punishment Doesn't Fit the Crime, Sexual Assaults, sexual misconducts, Violence Against Members of Opposite Sex, White Picket Fence

Prince Andrew Accused of Sexual Assault, the Queen Stripped Him of His Title, He Will be Tried as an Ordinary Citizen

If you’re an XY, you just, can’t, EVER, keep your DICKS inside your pants, or your hands to yourselves, no matter the status here, and this one, blemished the British royals!!!  Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

On the thirteenth, the Buckingham Palace issued the statement, “With the Queen’s approval, the title of the Duke of York of Prince Andrew had been returned back to the Queen.  The Duke of York will be relieved of ALL of his public duties, and will be tried as an ordinary citizen in this case.”

The royals pointed out, that the affairs of Prince Andrew will now be delegate to other members of the royal household, and he will no longer be referred to as “Your highness”.  Andrew is the second son of the queen, and, her favorite, or so it’s been told.  But, in the strong recommendations of Charles, the next in line for the throne and Prince William, after the talk that the Queen had with Andrew alone, she’d made the decisions to sever him off from the ties of the royal household, to prevent further damage to the royals.

查看來源圖片
his accuser…photo from online

Andrew was accused by the American woman, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, that when she was only seventeen, she was assigned by Epstein, to have sexual intercourse with Prince Andrew, and she’d accused him of battery and assault.

Andrew had continually denied the allegations, but the Federal District Court of New York on the twelfth dismissed his request of withdrawing the case, meaning, that he will be face with this civil case, as the courts posted its verdict, the Buckingham Palace immediately posted the above statement.

Those who were on the inside told, that although Prince Andre had abdicated the title, and the monetary assistance from the royals, in actuality it was the Queen who’d, stripped him of his status, to have him get tried as an ordinary citizen, to avoid the embarrassment he will bring to the royal household.

And, more than a hundred fifty member of the royal navy and royal air force signed a petition, beckoning the Queen strip Andrew of his military title, as the pressures from the outside demanding the doing away with the monarchy, it’d put the Royals under enormous pressure; in their petition, they stated, “We are insecure, and angry at how Prince Andrew is a part of the royal military forces.”

查看來源圖片
from a day ago…from online

Prince Andrew served with the Royal Navy for twenty years, including as a helicopter pilot in the Falklands war, the very first member of the royal house who’d entered into the battlefield since the second World War, in 2015, he was promoted to the lieutenant general in the Navy; but now, he’d been, stripped of the honorary military status, he’d also, lost the honorary titles of military in countries with ties to Great Britain like Canada and New Zealand as well.

And so, this, is how a man, falls down, hard, he’s a member of the British royals, and yet, he couldn’t keep his hands to himself, this still just showed, how no matter WHO you may be, if you’re an XY, chances are, you can’t resist the temptations of S-E-X, and this prince, became, a total, PAUPER here!

Leave a comment

Filed under Abuse, Abuse of Power, Cost of Living, Crime & Punishment, Life, Sexual Assaults, sexual misconducts

The Predatory School Instructor Forced Five Students to Submit to Him Completely, Sentenced to Twelve and a Half Years

Now, a wolf in, a teacher’s “skin” here!!!  Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

The thirty-eight year-old male, Fang, was accused of signing an “absolute obedience contract” with five of his students, used an assortment of excuses to punish them, including having the students masturbate in front of him, with him, filming the process.  The Hsinbei District Court sentenced this predator to twelve years six months on charges of using his status of power to molest to film, that he’d severely, impacted the students’ mental health, and denied it, stated that his students had, blackened his name, on breaking the laws of children’s welfare and child protection.

The investigations found, in August of 2017, Fang started working as the victim male students’ homeroom and Chinese instructor, he’d taken advantage of his male students that they are not having a good relations with their families at home, they wanted to get into a good university, to get a passing grade in Chinese courses, or to keep the secrets for his students as a “trade-off” for his students to sell themselves to him, made them sign the “Absolute Obedience Pact”.

When the students didn’t do well enough on the tests, they are to get punished, and the punishments include masturbating in front of Fan, stripping to nude, and allowing Fang to beat their buttocks with a ruler, or having Fang taped up their hands, and tickling them nude, and tickling their genitalia too, and they were demanded by Fang to tape their own masturbation, there were at least five victims, and the term was over a year’s time.  As the other students learned of this, Fang texted his victims, “did you tell your classmates, that you asked for all of this”, “other than you, I’d, never, taken care of anybody else like this”, etc., etc., etc.

The male students who were victimized chose to keep everything silent, claimed to their fellow classmates, “I don’t want the instructor to be absent from our reunions in the future”, “I’m a bit, conflicted”, until the father of one of the victimized students found that something wasn’t quite right, and reported it.

The courts believed, that Fang, as a homeroom instructor, a Chinese instructor, not followed the morale of teachers, and took advantage of his students’ asking him for help with identity crises, families, and other pressures, to fulfill his own selfish desires, used his power status to molest, to film, to sent the sexually illicit messages to them, that he’d, severely, impacted his students’ mental health.

While Fang denied the accusations from start to finish, stated that the students had coconspired in setting him up, never apologized to his victims, nor reached a settlement agreement with them, the courts found him guilty on counts of power sexual molestation; how he’d, gone against his victims’ wills, and filmed the sexually illicit footages.

And, twelve years is still, two lenient if you ask me, (but who asked you!!!) this still just showed, how, there are, those, sexual predators, who dressed themselves up as school instructors, and, they can be everywhere, maybe, there’s, one in your kid’s schools, you just, don’t know, until it’s, too late, after their innocence had been, taken away, against their will, and, it would be you, the parents’ faults, for NOT paying enough attention, not BUSTING these sexual predators sooner, allowing your sons or daughters, to get hurt for this long a time.

Leave a comment

Filed under Abuse, Abuse of Power, Awareness, Criminals, Improper Behaviors of School Instructors, Knowing the Law and Breaking It, Messed Up Values, On the Wrong Side of the Law, Reforming a Sexual Predator, Sexual Assaults, sexual misconducts, White Picket Fence