Because money is, NEVER, quite, enough, is it??? Of course N-O-T!!! The crimes being committed, by a retired, police officer here, off of the Front Page Sections, translated…
The former officer, Huang from the Tainan Police Department was accused of receiving the bribes of anywhere from $30,000N.T. to $50,000N.T. a month and used his power status as the police, to cover for the sex bars, from getting checked, to the point of after his retirement, he’d, continued, taking in the bribes too, and the location of his receiving the bribes included the office of his police department, he was, very bold in his behaviors in breaking the law; the first and second trials, the courts sentenced Huang to ten years for using his status as the police to get bribes, the Highest Courts tossed back his appeal, and sentenced him to serve in jail.
The verdict pointed out, that from 2010 to 2016, as he was a disciplinary officer of the Tainan Police Department, in the district, two sex bar operators, to avoid police checks, had paid off the officers by the month, to get them to skip the searches; Huang told the bar own, “the cost is $30,000N.T. normally, but your bar is way too sexual, it’s worth more than $30,000N.T., I don’t want to do it”, and that was the confirmation of his receiving, the bribes.
and this, is how he’s, ended…
The courts investigated, that started in 2014, Huang would collect the money at his office, in front of the local parks, at his home, from the bars with the “dress code violations”, Huang was formally retired back in December 2nd, 2016, and still continued to take the “protection money” from the owners of the strip bars, and, received a total of more than $2 million N.T.s in illegally gained earnings.
The courts believed, that Huang was an officer of the law, but not followed the laws, extorted money from the bars, and destroyed the disciplines of the police, and, impacted the general atmosphere of the society, that it’d, added to the people’s distrusting the police, that it’d, affected the majority of the officers’ positive image for the people.
During the trial, Huang was sentenced to ten years for bribe in the first trial and second trial at the High Subsidiary Court, he was stripped of his public office position for five years, the Highest Courts found that the punishment was just, and tossed back his appeal, case is closed.
So, this loser still did NOT get away, from his bad work, of covering up the sex industries, and, this still just showed, how much easier it is, for an officer of the law, to commit the crimes, and even though, he is a former officer, he’d still, got enticed by money, and, kept taking the bribes after he was retired, and he deserved to be punished severely for that.
Back on that “subject” of “how can you reform a rapist”? You can’t! Remember that “law” of once and always, unless, they all get, CASTRATED, and I mean biologically, NOT, chemically! Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…
The man, Kang during his armed service terms fourteen years ago, tailed a female high school student, and raped her, he was out on parole last year, on the seventeenth of this month, he’d used the exact same measures, tailed after a woman into her apartment in Banciao, and, pushed her down on the stairs, attempted to rape her, but because the victim fought back hard, Kang used pepper spray on her face, took the woman’s phone and escaped. Two days ago, the police made the arrest, and sent him to the Hsinbei D.A.’s office on charges of robbery and physical assault, the D.A. interrogated him, and asked the courts to mandate his custody, which the courts signed off on.
what the man did…
The police found, the victim thirty-year-old woman, at five in the afternoon on the seventeenth, walked into her rented apartment in Banciao, not noting that Kang was tailing her, the woman unlocked the first floor door, Kang excused himself as wanting to go up to see a friend, tailed behind the woman, in the stairs, he’d, pushed the woman down, attempted to rape her.
Out of his expectation, the woman fought hard, kept kicking, punching, screaming, Kang worried it may alert the residents, took out the pepper spray, sprayed her face, grabbed her phone, then rushed off. The woman was thrilled, and had to calm herself down awhile, then, she’d, gone to the local police, to report the matter.
The police reviewed the surveillance, and found that Kang is a suspect, and because he’d used similar methods to rape and rob a high school female student fourteen years ago, the police believed there was a high chance that he could, offend again, and reported to the D.A.’s office, two days ago, they took a warrant to his home in Zhonghe, and arrested him.
And so, this still prove??? Oh yeah, you can’t, reform a SEX offender, and this LOSER tried to rape another woman again, only this time, he was, unsuccessful, and how, hopefully, he’ll be, locked up in that cage, until, he’s, too old to offend again.
Living under this DICTATOR, who’d called her self, a “democratically voted” president, and we the people are, getting, @#$%ED up!!! Commentary on the Front Page Sections, translated…
Taiwan was a self-claimed “A student” of defense against MERS-CoV, and yet, as the epidemic came, everybody flew into panic mode.
In May, the rise in the number of confirmed diagnoses came fast, and we’d often read those who are “exported” from Taiwan, who had been tested positive of the virus. On July 3rd, Xiamen reported, that there were an accumulated nineteen who came from Taiwan who’d been confirmed of MERS contraction. There’s the saying, that the U.S. and Japan set the Ct ratio to over forty, that was what constituted as negative, and the Ct ratio was set at thirty, and the Taiwanese tourists carrying the PCR negative test results and were found as positive in the airports. Why use this sort of self-deceit?
The locals, in order to maintain the low count of confirmed diagnoses, was that why the general scanning were done away with? The cost of the test is $7,000N.T. before you travel out; later reduced to $3,000N.T.s. The T.V. personnel Wu, bought a set of equipment out of his own pokcets, welcomed everybody who wanted to get scanned to get a scan, and charges only a little over $270N.T.s, and, the government immediately reduce the charges of the scans to $300 N.T.s What I can’t understand, is that a lot of the country’s citizens’ wellness checks are, free of charge, while, the general scans here, was once, a good business?
There are a total of over 700 individuals who’d died of contraction, the rate of close to five-percent; while the global average of death was only, two-percent. The reasons for the high death rate are due to the lacking in medical provisions, the needed care couldn’t be provided, with the lacking in the oxygen tanks. But, Taiwan’s all-citizen health insurance, was claimed as one of the most excellent in the world, but how come, the rates of death from MERS-CoV is this high?
There’s a saying: if the confirmed number of death “after amending the statistics” it would be, a little over 30,000, then the rate of death became, average in the world, but this belief is still, unfounded by the government’s confirmations. Not conducting the large-scale scans, with that good statistical head count, as the death rate hiked up faster and faster once the outbreaks started happening, so what is, the truth of all of this?
The best way, of containing the spread, in the time being, is having everybody vaccinated, but Taiwan had been, lagging behind in the availabilities of vaccines since the beginning of the epidemic in May. The government’s “getting ahead” is betting on the vaccines of the “Blackwater Company” of the U.S., without even the third stage clinical trials, nor had it, passed international certifications, and yet, the government already, ordered ten million doses.
like this one…
The distant water can’t put out a nearby fire, the Japanese gave us their unneeded, unused over three million doses of Astra-Zeneca. The elderly were the first to be inoculated, and after the vaccination started, the rates of death was shockingly high. There’s, no proof from the authorities, that the deaths are, directly related to, the vaccinations.
There were so many elders who’d died from the Astra-Zeneca vaccines, and it’s reasonable, that we doubt: the Astra-Zeneca vaccines may be causing the elderly population to die? The government doesn’t need to play defense for AZ vaccines, saying, “before there are enough evidence to prove this, AZ vaccines are, not guilty!”
The correct method: Japan, America, Israel, Denmark, Lithuania, and other European nations had banned the vaccines from AZ at one time. Our first shipments of AZ were from Japan, as the vaccines got on the flight, the diplomat stationed locally bowed deep, that photo showed, how belittling we the people in Taiwan truly, are.
And there’s, the statements of, “there are a total of four hundred deaths daily on average, with those over eight taking up eighty-percent. The elders are fearful as they’d heard this, you mean: we’re, all dying left and right, more than 300 a day, and, it’s not the AZ vaccines’ faults?” I beckon, that the officials in power, treat the elderly population with kindness and respect, unless you died young, everybody will first age, and then, die.
Taiwan prided itself on being an advanced economic system, money isn’t a problem, the country should take after the countries of France, U.S., England, to buy enough supplies of all available vaccines, that way, we wouldn’t get stuck in the predicament of having to fight for the COVAX vaccines with the third-world countries, and couldn’t get them. Using the excuses, to delegate the blames on someone else, the government can’t escape how incompetent it truly, is! Like the researcher, Chen of Central Research Agency stated, “the government is too arrogant, placing people’s lives, after power!”
In history, those in power often get too proud, too authoritarian in ruling, and the citizens all followed their leads, and, take whatever came to them; this is also, a form of habit of history too.
And so, this, mind of being enslaved it’s still, an abuser/enabler, because we the people (as a whole???) are too compliant to the government’s rules, and, we bow down to our government like G-O-D (read backward is??? Exactly!) and we fail to see, that the government’s policies are, killing us all, that there’s, NOTHING that we the people, CAN do, as the impeachment process would need two-thirds of the legislators voting over it, and we are all, ordinary people, and the legislators are, primarily, from the DDP, which meant, that they’d be, STUPID to vote down their own, party’s, president, so, we the people are, still, all, totally, SCREWED here!!!
The cases where the parents are, made to take responsibilities, over their children’s, behaviors, ruled by the court! Off of the Newspapers, translated…
The adage, “Parental debts are paid by the offspring”, but based off of the laws right now, the parents’ debts, don’t necessarily fall under the offspring’s responsibilities, but as the underage children were out, and done something bad, the parents may be made to pay collaterally, two young children in a preschool fought over a watch and started arguing, and one child scratched the other, injuring her/him the judge mandated the parents of the child who’d scratched to pay the injured child over $16,000N.T.s, the high school student, Chen, was running on the roads, and, bumped into a woman who was riding on an electric motorcycle, and he and his father were made to pay the woman $250,000N.T.s, the legal realm stated, the underage whether it be intentional or negligent, had hurt another, the legal guardians may have to pay for it by collateral, the parents must be really careful over this.
Based off of civil law, the children’s age limit was seven, before seven, the child have no control in restricting one’s own behaviors, those children older than seven have, and if children in these two age groups had impacted someone’s rights, and if the behaviors were determined as “under the awareness”, then the child will be paying for the wrongdoing legally with the parents, if not, it would be the legal guardians who must pay. But if the legal guardians can produce proofs that they’d not been loose on their rules of raising their young, or that there were already, reasonable rules established, then, the legal guardians don’t have to pay for their children’s behaviors.
Two young boys, Hwa and Ming (both false names) are students of a famous kindergarten in Taipei, two years ago, on an afternoon, Ming handed his new watch to other students to look at, and after the students looked at the new watch, they’d, handed it over to Hwa to see, as Ming tried to get the watch back from Hwa, Hwa refused, they started arguing, Ming scratched Hwa’s face twice, injuring him.
Later on, Hwa’s parents sued Ming’s parents in civil court, asking to pay for the damages to their young son in amount of over $1.4 million N.T.s, while Ming’s parents mentioned, how the preschool they’d selected for their son was a famous chain kindergarten in Taipei, that they’d, already, given the best forms of education to their own young; while the judge believed, that the parents hadn’t, because the child couldn’t know what he did was right or wrong, the parents of the child have to pay for the damages, in the end the courts found Ming’s parents to pay over $16,000N.T. to the other parents.
The fifteen-year-old high school student Chen two years ago, was running across the intersections, and rammed the woman on an electric bicycle, Yeh over, injuring her, Yeh sued the high school student and his parents for the damages; the courts reviewed the street surveillance, found that Chen wasn’t following the lights, because Chen was not yet twenty, he was categorized as “couldn’t restrict his own behaviors”, his father also couldn’t produce the proofs of his watching over his son’s behaviors, that he was collaterally, responsible, the courts found that Chen and his father must pay Yeh a total of over $250,000N.T.s.
And so, this still showed, how under a certain age, when a kid misbehaved, the parents are responsible, unless you the parents, can prove, that you had, given the rules to your children to follow, and this would be, interpreted by the courts, which means, that the judge can see it, either way, and, there’s, no way of you, the parents knowing, if you’ll get sued, so, the best way to prevent this, is by, teaching your young the right rules and, keep your fingers crossed, that they don’t, get into, too much troubles…
How this MANWHORE, raped, his, “Jane”, because a “John” is the male form for a client who buys sexual services??? Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…
The male public relations after his female client was passed out from drinking, took her to a hotel, then raped her, Chen claimed that the victim had, “coaxed” him out, and, in his business, that’s, the signal for sex trade; she’d told him no, but, “When a woman says no, she meant, yes”. The Taipei District Court believed, that when a woman says no, it’s no, and, sentenced Chen to opportunistic rape for three years ten months. This can be appealed.
In the reading of the verdict, the court quoted U.N.’s “Pact to Rid of ALL Forms of Prejudices, Stereotypes Against Women”, that the crimes of obstructions against sexual freedoms, the individual can choose “yes or no”, “when”, “how”, and “with whom”, to have sex with.
The verdict stated, that ANY sexual behaviors warrants the respects from both parties, a consensus must be, reached, “NO means NO!”, “Yes means, YES!”, without the clear verbal consents, it’s, equivalent to a “no”!
The verdict also stated, the party who’d demanded the act be performed, need to make sure, that the other party is completely aware of what was about to happen, and has to agree to it, and so, as the person falls silent, it’s interpreted as “I don’t want to”, and the hesitations of the other party, is also, “I don’t want it!”; and, when someone goes home with you, it’s not consensus to have sex, and, as the person agrees to kiss or hug, that also isn’t, giving consent to have sex either.
The district attorneys accused, that Chen works as a public relations personnel at “Male Model” in Zhongshan District in Taipei, on October 31st of 2019, the victim went to get drunk there, Chen told his agent, Hong, to get him out with her, and so, Hong asked Chen to take the victim to a nearby hotel to rest up. Chen was suspected of stripping the victim’s clothes off, and then, raping her, the victim told Chen “NO!”, but Chen wouldn’t stop, and the victim ran into the bathrooms, texted Hong for help.
And so, what’s wrong, is not only the man’s behaviors, but the whole system, I mean, what the FUCK (don’t pardon me here!), just because a woman is getting drunk at a night club, where male hookers are being taken out, that does NOT mean that she is looking for that FUCK (don’t pardon me!) for the night, and what this LOSER did, was, rape, and he deserve to get charged with it, and, sentenced, severely, besides, the woman told him “NO!”, and, when a woman says: NO, and a loser still, goes, “all the way”, that’s, RAPE for ya!
And this case still happened because??? Oh yeah, LOSERS still have difficulties, keeping their, DICKS inside their pants, so, maybe all of us women, should start carrying that MACHETE, inside our bags, so we can, chop-chop??? And no, none of us is going to feed that SHIT to our dogs, ‘cuz??? Oh yeah, they all deserved, BETTER quality, MEATS.
Murdering her own young son, and this woman had a history of postpartum depression, and her lacking in social support that she’d needed, was what made her kill her own young son! Such a tragedy, for this family…off of the Front Page Sections, translated…
The Thirty-Something Indonesian Migrant had Smothered Her Own Young Son with a Pillow, Causing Him to Die from Asphyxiation, by the Time Her Father-in-Law Returned, it was Too Late to Save the Child
The tragedy occurred yesterday in Hsinchu. An Indonesian migrant couldn’t deal with her own one-year-old younger son’s crying repeatedly, she’d taken a pillow, smothered his face, causing him to die of asphyxiation, as her father-in-law returned home, he’d called 119, but by the time the paramedics arrived, the young child was already, without his vital signs, they’d rushed him to the hospitals and he’d died; the coroners, and the district attorneys and police examined the body, they’d not found any external injuries on the young boy, the D.A. called for an autopsy on the twelfth to clarify the cause of death, after the interrogation, the woman is out on a $30,000N.T. bail.
Base off of understanding, the murder happened at an east side mansion in Hsinchu, with the family of five living together, the woman’s husband was out at work, her father-in-law, out too, with the woman caring for her own four year-old and a little over-a-year-old sons; at the time of the incident, the eldest son was suspected of being elsewhere, playing on his own, as the woman accompanied her younger son to nap, she got upset with her own young son’s crying, and, lost control, murdered her own second born son.
The woman’s father-in-law returned home shortly afterwards, found that the a little-over-a-year-old younger grandson not moving in the bedroom, his face turned white, he’d immediately called the fire department; as the paramedics arrived, they’d found that the infant was too young, that it wouldn’t be suited for him to have the AED, they can only continue doing CPR on him, then, rushed him to the Cathay Hospital, but, they still couldn’t save him; the police were notified, and went to investigate, the social services was also called.
The city government stated, that the family wasn’t listed as “high-risk”, that there’s no records of any issues regarding violence, the social workers had already, intervened; and because the woman was Indonesia, they’d asked a translator to help the police investigate, the four-year-old older son didn’t show any signs of abuse, was left in the care of other family members.
The police found, that the two sons are very healthy, without any special conditions, that the woman was suspected of having postpartum depression, had been treated by the psychiatric department regularly, she’d not been well at all in the past six months, she was quite unstable yesterday too; the coroners’ examined the infant boy’s body, found no external injuries, no ligature markings, to be thorough, the district attorney’s office decided to conduct an autopsy.
And so, this, is what made this woman CRACK, her young infant son started crying, and she’s left all alone, and she had prior histories of postpartum depression too, and this still show how the lack of social and emotional support, had driven this woman to MURDER her own young son! And to think that this could’ve been, easily, prevented too…had the help came on time, but it didn’t!
To prevent your kid from getting into trouble while you’re away at work, you’d, LEASHED him up, like a D-O-G!!! Wow, that’s, smart all right…off of the Front Page Sections, translated…
An eight-year-old boy in Miaoli was found, chained with steel chains by his birthfather at the residence they shared in Toufeng, Miaoli, the child called out to help to his mother in Taoyuan, the mother rushed over, couldn’t get the chains off, and called emergency, the firefighters used the oil pressure clips and finally free the boy; the police and county department found the father used inappropriate measures to discipline the child, that he’d broken the laws of child and adolescent welfare, they’d filed for an emergency restraining order against the father, placed the child out, the district attorney’s offices set the man’s bail at $50,000N.T.s.
The local fire department received at call at around 10:37 in the morn, from the birthmother of the young boy, told them that the child was chained up in his living room, and couldn’t break out of the chains; as the firefighters arrived, they’d found the chain to be three meters long, they were able to use the oil pressure cutters and other equipment, to break the chains, and it took more than ten minutes to free the child, they’d notified the police and social services afterwards.
The preliminary investigations found, that the parents of the child is divorced, the custody was with the father, starting last year, there’d been records of domestic violence on record with the father, but the inappropriate discipline measures were mild, the Social Services did NOT list them; yesterday as the father goes out to work, worried that nobody’s looking after the child, that the boy may run off, so he’d, chained up his own son, to restrict the child’s movements, left the milk, the bread in the living room for the young boy to consume when he gets thirsty or hungry.
Because the child couldn’t stand being chained down, his movements restricted, he’d called his mother for help, “I got chained by dad, can you come save me?”, the mother thought that it wasn’t possible, rushed over to her ex’s from Taoyuan, and was dumbfounded at what she saw; the child said he’d misbehaved, which was why he got chained up, that he was beaten, and scolded often, it’d made the mother sad.
The police assisted the young boy to the hospital, found the bruising on his waist from the chains, immediately filed for a restraining order for the boy, investigated the case as assault, obstructions of freedom; the Social Services found that the father, chaining the boy down, although it’d not caused him bodily harm, or serious injuries, but, the behavior may have traumatized the child physically as well as psychologically, that he’d broken the laws against protection of young children and adolescents, guilty of improper disciplining, placed the child out of the father’s custody, and forced the father into the parenting courses.
And so, because you had to work, there’s no one to watch your kid, to keep him out of trouble, so you’d, CHAINED him up like a dog, I mean, you had, left water, and food for him (and that should be enough, if he were a DOG!!!), and, you’d, caused psychological trauma in your own child, and you don’t even know it, are you, @$%#ING, kidding me here? How would you like it, if someone CHAINED you, fucking (don’t pardon me!) adults up, and restricted your movement, because the individuals didn’t want YOU to, misbehave when they are out?
In this case, the death penalty would seem more, fitting, but, look on the “bright side”: now this LOSER will, forever get, GNAWED by his own, guilty conscience for MURDER, and my guess would be, that he’s going to wish that he had, gotten, the DEATH penalty instead of the life-terms! Crime and punishment, off of the Front Page Sections, translated…
The man Chen abused his girlfriend’s three-year-old daughter long-term, last June, he’d fed the child amphetamine, and FM2, causing her to die, afterwards, he’d moved the body from Taichung to his home in Nantou to dispose of. The Nantou District Courts sentenced him on abuse of a child, murder, and disposing of the body, that he’d, falsified the cause of death to mislead the investigators, that he was with, great malice, to life in prison yesterday, and he will be stripped of his government post for life.
Last September, the district office and police investigators dug up the three-year-old young girl’s body in the vegetable garden that belonged to Chen’s family, that was when this brutal murder of a young child came out into the light. The verdict stated, that Chen and the child’s birthmother were friends, and he was asked to look after the young girl. He knew that the child was only three, and couldn’t express herself verbally well enough, he’d used the girl as a punching bag, abused, and tortured the child.
In the city of Nantou last year in February, he’d beaten the child on the head, causing her to suffer a fractured skull, subdural hematoma. In May, he’d poked the young girl with a bamboo chopstick on her thigh until she’d bled, physically abused her to injury with a wooden panel; the child sustained injuries on her ey4es, he’d, taped up her head and eyes, it’d freaked the young girl out.
Last June, he’d smacked the young girl on her hand, her legs, her feet, and her buttocks with an iron ruler, the shoe racks, punished the young child physically by making her “bridge”, causing trauma to the young child’s life.
And, Chen had been abusing FM2 and amphetamine long-term, the adults can easily overdose on these substances, last June in his Taichung residence, he’d forcefed the young girl the drugs twice, the child died of asphyxiation from the drugs, that caused her to have difficulties breathing, and died.
Chen worried that her body might be discovered by the police, contacted Tsai and the child’s mother, lifted her body to a relative’s home to stash, worried that the scent of the body rotting away might be discovered, so he’d taken her body to the vegetable gardens, and buried her.
After the case was discovered, Chen denied having abused the child to death, and falsified the cause of death of the young girl, attempted to mislead the police in their investigations, the judge believed, that Chen took such brutal methods to torture, and abuse the child, to use her as a punching bag, causing her to die of asphyxiation, force fed her illegal substances, that he’d intended to take her life, sentenced him to life in prison, and stripped him of his public office position for life.
And so, don’t know why this son-of-a-bitch didn’t get the DEATH penalty, because maybe, it’s not a mass shooting, with many victims dead and injured, it’s just this, young child whose life had been taken too soon, and this LOSER will now, get gnawed by his own guilty conscience for murdering an innocent child, for the rest of his life, so yeah, that’ll be a fate, far worse, than death, I suppose!!!
He’d, hung on, for long as he possibly could already, and now, at least, he’s, no longer, in pain! Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…
The seven-year-old young boy, Huang refused to do the move of dual sleeve hang in a judo class outside of school, the coach, He forced the child to complete the moves, the coach was suspected of slamming the child over his shoulders, throwing his body onto the mats, and told another boy, Liao, to body slam the child too, causing Huang to hit his head on the floors, and sustained traumatic head injuries; the Taichung D.A.’s Office prosecuted the coach, He on charges of severe injuries by physical assault, suggested to the courts to hand down a severe sentence. After more than seventy days of emergency resuscitation, the child died last night, the parents agreed to get the child unplugged, they’d melted down beside his hospital bed.
The hospital stated, that in the last few days, there was, a clear drop in blood pressures, and pulse in the child, that it’d not looked, optimistic at all, they’d notified his parents to be there at around nine in the evening last night, which they’d agreed to terminate his life-support and stop resuscitation. The boy went to the hospital more than seventy days ago, when they’d started working on him, and he’d still, died, the hospital staff were also, grief-struck.
On the sixth, Huang’s father only posted on FB, that he’d just had a birthday, and his only hope was that his son could wake up, safe and healthy again.
At the start of the month, the Fengyuan Hospital stated, that the child is in a level three comatose, with deteriorating functioning to his brain, digestive systems, and still needed to be on the respirators.
Huang’s mother stated then, “I believe, that justice will be served for my own young son, and I want the coach to take responsibility too.” She’d felt unfair, of how the coach was out on bail, and her own son is in the ICU, battling life and death.
The father of the child wrote on FB on the sixth, that from April 21st to date, my Super Mario, Wei-Wei, you’d been brave and strong all the way, during this time, you’d gained a ton of emotional support online, for us.”
Huang stated then, that he was grateful for everybody’s support, that he believed, that his son will improve, that as he’d past his birthday on June 1st, he only has one wish: that his son will wake up healthy again, this would make him happiest, he believed, that his wish will come true, hoped that the online community can keep on sending the goodwill to his son.
And so, this, is how this young boy died, and, it’s still due to the coach’s lacking in emotional control, and, the boy fought hard, and, still died, and, this family suffered, a huge loss. It’s, truly, tragic!
The mother was, neglectful, to say the least, but she had an “alibi”, she’d not found her kid until she came home from work! One more kid that dropped dead here!!! Off of the Front PageSections, translated…
The Clinic the Child was Taken to Told the Families that the Child Needed to Go to a Major Hospital, the Suspect Didn’t, after the Mother Came Home from Work Several Hours Later, Did She Finally Call for Help, Her Boyfriend Taken into Custody
Two days ago in the afternoon, Chen went to the fire department asked for help, claimed that her three-year-old son was having a “stomach ache”, by the time the ambulance arrived in the hospital, the boy was, not showing any vital signs, after the emergency resuscitation measures were performed, he was pronounced dead, the hospital reported the case as suspected abuse; the police and district attorneys found that it was the cohabiting boyfriend, Yang who abused the child physically, denied the abuse, the district attorneys after the interrogations asked the courts to have Yang into custody, and the courts allowed it, while Chen was listed as a witness, and sent home, an autopsy is scheduled today, to clarify the cause of death for the young boy.
The investigations found, that the twenty-two year-old Chen is divorced from her ex, they each took custody of a son, her ex took their eldest, moved back south, while Chen and her three-year-old youngest son lived in Longjing District, Taichung; Chen works in a betel nut stand, was all right economically, after the divorce, she’d started cohabiting with the thirty-one year-old man, Yang, and there wasn’t any records of domestic violence on file for the family.
At around three o’clock in the afternoon two days ago, Chen called emergency, stating that her three-year-old son is having a stomach ache and needed to get to the hospital, the fire department sent out the ambulance, before they arrived in the hospital, the child was already dead, the hospital unsuccessfully resuscitated him. The hospital found there were new and old bruises on the young boy’s abdomen and back, seemingly from external forces, and, notified the social services’ violence prevention center, and the police too.
The police investigated, that two mornings ago, Yang took the boy to a local clinic, the physician at the clinic found the boy serious injured, wrote a transfer slip, told Yang to take the boy to a major hospital, but Yang didn’t, he’d taken the boy home; in the afternoon, as Chen came home from the betel nut stand where she worked, she’d found her son, she’d immediately notified the local firehouse for help, but she was, three, to four hours too late, the child was already, in a comatose.
In the interrogations, both Chen and Yang claimed, that they would discipline the boy normally, but denied the allegations of abuse, as they were sent to the D.A.’s office, Chen told the officials, that her boyfriend had beaten her son up, but Yang denied it, and, evaded the D.A.’s questions; the district attorneys believed that Yang was involved in manslaughter, with the flight risks, and the corroborating of his statements, destroying the evidences, asked the courts to have him into custody, which the courts signed off on.
The police and D.A. went to check the body of the young boy, found there were the old and new large areas of bruising on the child’s back and abdomen, but couldn’t determine what the cause of death was, the district attorneys ordered an autopsy to clarify the cause of death.
The birthfather of the young boy expressed his anger on Facebook, “how can you be so cruel in the treatment of a child?”, and grieved for his own young, “you’re no longer in pain now, do grow up happy in another world, daddy will, always, love you”, it’d made all who’d read felt very sorrowful.
And so, the mother, although she wasn’t present when her own son was brutally murdered by her boyfriend, she’s still, at fault, for enabling his abuse, she’d FAILED to protect her own son from the abuse of her boyfriend, and yet, the police only zoomed in on the perpetrator, the boyfriend who was the one who’d, actually, physically, beaten this young boy to death, why is that? Oh yeah, because the mother wasn’t present, and she couldn’t do anything to save her son, was that it?
Well, there must’ve been previous encounters of the boyfriend’s, abusing her own son, so, why did she do nothing? And yet, only the man who’d, brutally MURDERED her own young son was, arrested…