Every Time, Another MASS SHOOTING Occurred…

Every time, another MASS SHOOTING occurred, you see those, government officials (the members of the Congress, Senate, House Representatives, yada, yada, yada) swear UP and DOWN that AISLE, to CRACK down on ownership of guns (i.e. a stricter rule for purchasing, blah-blah-blah), and this last for???  No more than, three NANOSECONDS (as that would be, the attention span of modern day man, or maybe shorter, as we all became, addicted to those, three-second long, TikTok videos here???), then, everything gets, put OUT of, all of our, minds.

Every time, another MASS SHOOTING occurred, you’d hear those government officials, SWEAR that they’re going to CRACK down on the laws on stricter mandates of ownership of guns, the banning of owning of illegal firearms, having a tougher set of standards on getting the license (like say???  A SIX-MONTHS to a YEAR’s waiting period, but, would that be enough???), and, what happened to those, “promises”???  Oh yeah, it all went into, that, TRASH pile, labeled, “Yesterday’s NEWS”!

“FIRE in the HOLE!!!”, in “slow-motion” here…photo from online

That, is what happens, every time, another MASS SHOOTING occurred, people feel scared, not knowing, if it’ll be safe for them, to shop at a local mall (‘cuz, who’s to say, that PSYCHO with a MACHINE GUN won’t come in, and shoot us all???), and so, we all start, carrying our own separate, “concealable weapons” (preferably fitting into our tiny little, purses, to PROTECT ourselves!)…

And yet, who’s to say, those LOADED guns won’t fire by “accident”?  I mean, there were, already, the PRECEDENCE of a kid playing with a loaded gun of his mamas, and, BOOM!, SHOOTING his little ten-year-old (think she was!) girlfriend (friend who WAS a girl, not going out on dates!) somewhere NOT near her VITAL organs, from???  2010, 2011, 2012, or, when was that SHIT again???  Yeah, I can’t remember NO more (and your point being???).

So, you think it’s safe, to have a FIREARM in your house?  Yeah, the LAWS will NEVER change, until HALF of the LEGISLATORS (or maybe more would be needed???) lost someone they loved to gun-related violence or accident, because hey, safety’s off!

B-O-O-M!!!

And maybe, GUN CONTROL is NOT, what we need, PEOPLE CONTROL, is, as them guns, well, they don’t, FIRE themselves now, do they???  Yeah, think on it…

As the Trial by Jury System Started, How Can it Ensure the Righteousness of the Decisions

Now, we get the “show” of TWELVE ANGRY MEN (or however there may be on the juries here???) in reality here, off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

The system of trial by jury had formally begin, and, for the first three years, the cases of intentional crime causing death, like murder, vehicular manslaughter, assault causing death, and other crimes, will be decided by three court justices, plus six jurors.  And, these cases are now, questioned for the righteousness of the judgments.

In the cases where the jurors are called, the courts needed to randomly pick out the members of the jury.  The selection proceedings, would be hosted by the court judges, and the district attorneys, along with the defense attorney will take turns, and asking questions on the prospect jurors, to get rid of those individuals with an already, formed opinion.  The district attorneys, the defendant, and the defense attorney all had four without-reason means to eliminate the jurors, plus the process of selection isn’t open to the public, how can it be certain, that the justified, the correct jurors got selected, and, this can only come, after the system of trial by jury begins.

What’s more troubling is, that although the court justice will tell the jurors not to discuss the specifics of the cases they’re presiding over, that if there’d been found to be disclosures, then, the jurors would be facing a six-months sentence or less, but, it would be next to impossible, for the jurors to find the specifics of the cases from online, or the related reports, the information on the defendants, to the point of, discussing the cases with the public on their opinions of the cases.  And, as this is expected to happen, it will, not jut cause the pressures on the jurors, but also, it would, impact the fairness of the trials, and these are, some challenges that this system of trial by jury will be facing.

what we will, be, looking at during the trials now! From the play, off of YouTube

And so, all of these issues, the justice system failed to consider, before it’d, implemented the trial-by-jury system, and these are important considerations, I mean, how would you know, that the families of these jurors of these cases they’re going to rule on, won’t look up the details of the case, especially if the cases they’re sitting in are major scale, murders, or money laundering, or others?

So, it’s going to take a long period of adjustment for the system of trial by jury, to finally, fall onto, the right tracks, and, those who’d committed the crimes, during this, first few months to first few years, can’t expect a fair case for them, as they’re, the newest “lab rats”, used to test this, new system!

The Votes are the BEST Weapons Toward an Opaque Government

How WE the people, SHOWED the DICTATORSHIP of the DDP, that we will, NO longer put up with their, abuse, by the votes…off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

There’s a very low turnout rate in the nine-in-one elections, reasons are because people took the votes as nothing we can use, to change things, after all, putting democracy into practice should be an everyday thing, not just at election time.

In recent decade, the world’s countries started unifying the standard operations of voting, the four core values included: transparency, participation, review of the government’s actions by we the people, in hope that we can, knock open the door of government, to allow the citizens to participate in setting up the laws, to enforce the practices of democracy in our, every day living.  This seemingly new political movement, is actually, related to our, daily living.

The issues considered by the people in this last election included the matter of purchasing of vaccines, the quality of construction of the Hsinchu Baseball Park, the cases of plagiarism of the researchers in the Agriculture Department, as well as the mayoral candidates, all of these are related to the transparencies of public information.

Starting with the matter of the baseball park in Hsinchu, a stadium that’s not been evaluated for the safety of use, can it start being used, this is directly related to the safety of those who use the stadium.  And, the results of rushing to allow for use, is the risk of the players life.  Like all the constructions that are in our ives, and, often, there’s, that steady stream of information, that didn’t update as the construction was being worked on, and sometimes, people have NO clue what’s being built behind the fences.

Then, there’s the purchasing of the vaccines, and it’s clearly, NOT as the party that was in power stated, “we’re ahead of the rest”, and what’s more questionable, was that the contracts of purchase submitted by the Department of Health & Welfare had been blacked out for most parts, and, there was the clause of the purchases staying under cover for as long as thirty years too, and the statistics evaluation department, demanded that the Department of Health & Social Welfares to be opened up about the purchases of the vaccines, without breaching the confidentiality clause.

As for NCC’s allowing Mirror Media to set up the station to air so quickly, it’s unclear if the higher up government offices had a hand in it or not, the current and past C.E.O. of the station have their separate claims; the Department of Agriculture found the ancient research documents, and started up the investigations of whether or not there’s the infringements of rights………, these cases, not only did NOT help with the people’s interpretations of the candidates in question, it’d put more doubts, and the party in power is the most responsible for this, reason being that the processes of handling the investigations aren’t, transparent enough.

Take for instance, the research hosted by Chang, the KMT candidate for the mayor of Taoyuan, it was the ONLY case of encroachment that the Department of Agriculture had looked into in its history!  How can we not think, that it was targeting the candidate from the KMT ticket?

As for the rights of the citizens, the government has the duties, to show the information that it’s discovered, to satisfy the people’s needs to know.  Demanding the government be open, to lift up all the covers, we would better avoid the cases of bribes, and it can be used as examples to follow in future elections too.  What those in power wanted to keep out of public awareness, there may be more that’s harmful to we the people, hidden in them, while, the best way to show the government that’s not transparent enough, IS, with our, votes!

And so, this was, exactly what WE the people had done, we’d, VOTED the DDPs out of the majority of the local government offices this time around, because of what happened with the DDP, how it’d, screwed us over, and, we are still, getting the party back, for ALL who’d died, due to the delayed purchases of the vaccines, of how the DDP is making us eat poison from other countries, making this country’s people into everybody’s BITCH, well, guess what, we the people will NO longer put up with the abuse by our government, that, was what this last local election showed.

Stripping Those Contracted of Their Voting Rights, the Taiwanese Human Rights Activist Group Criticized the DDP for Discrimination

How we continued, to get, controlled, by the DICTATORSHIP of Tsai and her party, the DDP, and there’s nothing we can do about it, and, these are the votes, lost, because they never get cast, because the government banned its people from voting!  Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

The Central Elections Commissions, the Command Center announced, that there are around 65,000 contracted who would be banned from voting this year, the chairperson of the Central Elections Commission, Lee stated, to protect the rights to vote and the safety and health of the officials, everything is, by the book.  There were, another seven death row inmates who couldn’t vote in the public issues, who’d asked the courts for a day off from serving the time, the Taipei Highest Executive Courts tossed back the ruling.

The secretary of the Human Rights Advancement Association in Taiwan, Shih told, that the government’s ban of voting by the contracted, is a round-and-about kind of discrimination, that Central Elections Commissions not doing anything about this, is stripping us of our rights to vote.

The head of the Examination Department, Chen said, the executive department should’ve examined the issues of the contracted voting long ago, that if there’s the problems, the department should tell the public about it sooner, that would be the behaviors of a responsible, transparent, government.  The director of the Command center, Wang stated that he would, respect it.

As for the rights to vote for the death row inmates, the judiciary systems believed, that the inmates are citizens, in prison uniforms, other than being restricted by the jail, there should NOT be a ban on their rights to vote.  The Central Elections Commission is only responsible for directing, supervising the voting proceedings, that it’s not a primary unit responsible in overseeing this, the seven death row inmates can’t have a day off using the Central Elections Commission as an excuse.

And so, these are the votes that don’t count: those serving time in prison, those who’d contracted MERS-CoV, those who are in their at-home quarantine sessions, and those who didn’t register with the land offices at their household registry, and, these are all the votes that won’t get, counted, because, this government does NOT give a flying FUCK (so???) about the people’s, rights!

Is There a Conflict Between the Ethics & the Freedoms of Marriage?

On the debate of whether or not the party that’s had an affair is allowed to start up the decree of divorce or not!  Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

The debates in the Constitution Courts got started, the debate is on “whether or not the party at fault in a marriage is allowed to start up the process to divorce”?  the side that’s in support of the current law, believed, that the party who was wrong at first, should NOT be allowed to benefit from her/his own illegal actions (having an affair and be allowed to divorce one’s own wife!), in restricting the right to file for divorce would be justified for the ethics code of love that people are living by.  The side that believed that the current law should be unconstitutional stressed that the laws guarantee the freedoms of marriage, including the rights to divorce, that the laws needed not step in, to an already, broken marriage.

This is something that needs thorough evaluation, the values, the benefits, and also at the same time, the matter of, “consequences”, an issue that needed thorough, contemplation.  Is it unconstitutional for “the party who’s to blame to not have the right to divorce”, this is dependent on the individuals’, interpretations of the, matter.  But in the constitutional debate and the legal realm, and when people start discussing this matter, there’s a trending belief that needed to be evaluated over: marriage is freedom, and it shall NOT be bound by the morals and the ethics!

This group set ethics, moral against freedom, believed, that modern day countries’ constitutions protected the freedoms, to allow the individual to go up against the majority, so ethics, moral, and personal feelings (marriage and divorce), the freedoms, should NOT be restricted.

Under this belief system, “freedom” is a neutral value, with the ethical considerations taken out.  Those who preached personal freedoms, are considered advanced and modern; and when those who’d preached about ethics, and values, that’s, oppression.  Similar beliefs are used in debating the validity of same-sex marriages.  Some who are for same sex marriages claimed, “two people who love one another, why are they restricted by the country to love each other?”.  While anyone who’d equated marriage to ethical values gets attacked.

Another case was in the decriminalizing of adultery.  The Grand Justices, although didn’t deny the responsibilities of both party being faithful to one another in the marriage, but the reasoning books stated, “in a marriage, personal freedom ranked higher than the functionality of the society”.  Which showed the grand justices’ leaning toward “freedom as priority” more.

And yet, putting “Freedom” opposite of “ethics”, believing that the constitution protects the former, and not the latter, this is, quite problematic.  In recent times, the major debates of laws have to do with the ethical values, the reasonings behind the laws.  Marriage (same-sex, adultery and divorce), punishment (death penalty), forced apologies, abortions………. if we don’t have a proper conversation with the ethics, the morale of these, then, the problems simply, can’t be, solved.  But, as people get into argument on the issues, they’d always dodged “ethic”, the MOST important consideration of all.  The side that supported freedom believed, that ethic is the leftover from the caste systems, the side that fought for the ethics only stated that current situation, traditions, are a product of, ethical values that’s passed down from ages ago, not mentioning the interaction of the modern values with these age-old beliefs.

A lot believed, that laws and ethics should be separated like church and state, or that these are the most basic of freedoms that humans are endowed, that simply can’t be restricted by morality.  These beliefs of freedom that’s “demoralized”, is slanted.  The debates of ethics, the arguments of law, can’t avoid.

Marriage is a form of contract too, but, how come, the “contract” between two people needed the law to enforce, to, guarantee?  This is a matter of, “ethics”, and, on the marriage itself, or the assets, people need to discuss thoroughly on.  Personal freedom or not, what constitutes as a “breach of contract”?  And, what’s the difference between identity and the laws on assets?

Anyways, the forefront of freedom is ethics, forgetting ethics, morality, the claims of freedom would be without confound.  The beliefs of freedom need to respond to ethics, stating ones’ own values clearly; the conservatives should NOT use ethics like a magical spell, not talked about the contents, and just using it as a motto.  In the legal debates of ethics, if there’s the lacking of the delicate conversations of moral values, then we would become like the Pharisees, using the edicts to hurt people, and feeling that they are, just.  Same should be considered in the debate of whether the party at fault should have the right to divorce.

And so, this goes beyond the law, there are still the socialization, the ethic code, the expectations of society to consider in the matter of whether or not the party at fault should have the right to divorce.  And I do NOT believe, that the party AT fault should have the right to divorce, because you’re the ones who’d fouled up in the marriage first, and that’s why, you do NOT have the right to call your spouses out, to divorce them, the spouses that weren’t cheating are the ones who have the rights to divorce, that’s only fair, after all the ones who’d not cheated aren’t the ones to screw around outside the marriage.

The Crocodiles without the Tears: Making the Empty Promises to Get Our Votes, Once in the Office, “I’m Sorry, WHO are You???”

Them candidates will say, any and everything that we the people want to hear, but soon as the votes are over, it’ll be, WHO are you, and, DID I promise that, I don’t believe I ever, had!  The LIES they are selling to us, voters, as the election nears, off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

The polls showed, that the mayoral candidates of Taipei City was built with hate, that the critiques by the media was actually, an outlet of the people’s, anger toward the DDP government.  The Taiwanese idiot had “before the elections, the grandeur promises, and afterwards: who are you again???”, this was the embodiment of the DDP’s being inconsistent in its attitude, of all the false promises the party’s made to the voters who elected them into office.

The primary reason for this accumulation of displease lies in how the party in power only considered the benefits of those who are in office, with no regard for people’s lives, and, are chickened out to face up to the anger of we the people.  There were the news of the former and current head of Sanitation Welfare Department’s getting together, to offer one another encouragements, to pat one another on the backs.  The thousand-day anniversary of the Command Center for MERS-CoV had a grand celebration, with the president, the head of state, present; and what’s weird was, there were, the multiple funerals for those who’d died in the current pandemic, the memorials, but the higher up government officials were all, no-shows, and they were criticized as “crocodiles without the tears”.

“The Thousand-Day Milestone of the Command Center for MERS-CoV”, people would think, that the focal point would be to remember, to commemorate those who’d died in the pandemic, but the higher up government officials, showed a total, lack of, respect for the dead.

Another reason for why the public is upset, is also on how unprofessional the party in power, how the party in power are, only into its own, private gains.  Take for instance, the breaking of the artifacts of the Palace Museums, they’d, brushed the matter off as being, one man’s carelessness, and blamed the breaking of the artifacts on the carelessness of the exhibition management, or how the systems of protecting the artifacts hadn’t done their jobs properly.

Third reason for why the people are completely upset, was how the party in power used the manipulative means, to split up the masses, to cause the split in the people who are originally, kindhearted.  Using the “hatred toward China” as their primary card to play, calling out to the people to defend Taiwan, to FIGHT against the Chinese Communist rule, in reality, it’s ensuring, that the reputations of the higher up officials from the DDP maintained.  The preciousness of democracy lies in that there are multiple opinions allowed, and each opinion gets heard, and is respected, and now, everything is based off of the colors, which will only, heighten the upsets of we the, people.

There are now, more than 12,000 citizens who’d lost their lives in the pandemic so far, and, as the higher up government officials could, stop breaking the country apart, splitting the people, to turn the votes, and start focusing on doing things that are beneficial to the people instead, only then, will the hatred, and the angers of we the people be gone from Taiwan, do all the higher up officials of the DDP government know this?

Of course not, they don’t know SHIT, all they care about, is winning the mayoral election at the beginning of January next year, and, blackening the opponents’ names, thinking, that they can still, bullshit we the people, and, they probably can, because, there are those, BLIND supporters of the DDP, who will be voting at the elections, while those of us, who saw the truth as the pandemic started (how the DDP blocked off the shipments, the orders of BioNTech into the country, because the agent for Asia East is a pharmaceutical company in Shanghai, and how it’d, delayed the ordering, the shipments of vaccines, causing us to become, beggars for these necessities we need, to survive through the pandemic, but, none of this SHIT will matter, because we the people are color-coded, blind and stupid, and we will, continue to allow the DDP to take charge over this god DAMN @#$%ING island, until China DROPPED that NUCLEAR BOMB on the land, and this island S-I-N-K-S, or, with the effects of global warming, the sea level rises up, and this island becomes, underwater, whichever one comes, first!

The DDP Called Out for an Amendment to “Get Rid of Sun Yatsen”, the KMT Worked Hard to Block This “Bill”

The DDP’s, making SURE, that all of us here, living on this ISLAND, have NO way, of tracing back to our own, “roots”, by, getting RID of the Father of the Republic of China here!  Off of the Front Page Sections, because we are NOT the Republic of China, but TAIWAN!!!  This is, OUTRAGEOUS, I mean, you don’t see the American GOVERNMENT ERASING George Washington as the father of the U.S. of A, do you???  HECK no, and we the people, are still, enabling their, bad behaviors here???

This week, the legislator from the DDP including Lin, drafted up the amendment of “officials sworn into office regulation renewal” and the “rules of the President and Vice President’s Being Sworn into Office”, and if this amendment passes into law, in the future, all government personnel, as they’re sworn into office, they no longer needed to get sworn in, in front of the portrait of the father of our country.  The KMT questioned this act, that this was, the concrete evidence of the DDP’s “killing off” C.K.S., then, going after the father of our country, a play in their propaganda in the upcoming election, that the KMT legislator will all object to this to the very end.

like this???

except, it’s not a statue, but a painted portrait, with the red paints covering up the faces! Photo from online

Lin and others who are responsible for drafting up this amendment stated, that this was to coincide with the democratic spirit, along with matching up to the developments in the changes in the Constitution of this country currently, striking off that rule that stated that the elected officials must be sworn into office, in front of the portrait of Dr. Sun Yat-sen; and considering the society’s multivariate means, like bodily handicaps, or other justified reasons, there shouldn’t be restriction placed on the expressions of vowing to protect this country, to do what’s best for this country.  Both amendments are going to get presented at the legislative review sessions today.

This was NOT the very first time that the legislator of the DDP tried to “amend” the “swearing in process of government officials”.  Back in 2020, the legislator, Fang drafted up a similar amendment, asked the president, and all other government officials to NOT be required to get sworn into office in front of the portrait of Dr. Sun Yat-sen anymore, and this struck up the debates in the local communities.  The KMT questioned, that the timing of the amendment was right before the votes, which will cause the voters to split, that they’re working at making the people go against each other, to manipulate the votes.

here’s, what that, looked like! Vandalism of the C.K.S Statues…photo from online

And so, this, is what the DDP is currently planning to do, and chances are, they will get it their ways, because, they got everything their ways, passing the bills that made us ingest POISONS, delaying the purchasing of the vaccines, killing the people here, and now, they’re, erasing our own history, because they’re NOT Chinese, they’re, Taiwanese, making everybody on this island, battle against each other, and, when people are too busy fighting already, who do you think, will be, watching out for what this DDP government is doing to RUIN our lives???  NOBODY!

That, is how L-O-W this party had, gone here, and, we the people are, still, enabling their abuse of power, I mean, it’s NOT like there’s ANYTHING we CAN do, just look at the last issues vote we voted in…

If the Death Penalty IS, “Cruel & Unusual” Punishment

Yeah uh, this is still, BULLSHIT, if you ask me, buy hey, who asked Y-O-U!!!

If the death penalty IS, “cruel and unusual” punishment, then, what of the severe methods those perps had, tortured their vics, before they finally put them out, of their miseries, what of the perp that cut off a woman’s genitalia, after raping her, and then, murdering her, huh?  Wouldn’t that “constitute” as, “cruel and, unusual” too?

And yet, these “human right’s activists” from all around the world kept preaching on how we all need to, do away, with the death penalty, and should we now???

I mean, if the world’s completely without the death penalty, then, the EIGHTH amendment of the U.S. Constitution would be, struck, off of that, thousand year old, document, wouldn’t it???

And, consider this, IF it were, your loved ones who were, tortured, and brutally, raped, then, had their genitalia CUT off, just because the perp C-A-N, would you still feel, that death penalty was, “cruel” or, “unusual”???

If it’s, cruel and unusual, to hand down the death penalty and, enforcing that, then, wouldn’t BE, tortured by ones’ own, guilty conscience for what one has done to another, be even more, crueler?

So, do NOT bullshit about things you hadn’t weathered through there, higher up officials of every single country.

The YouTuber Lost Another Case, Claiming that the Sandy Hook Elementary School Mass Shooting was a Scam, Mandated to Pay Another $3.07 Billion

Like this god damn world isn’t, already MESSED up enough, and we still got these, CONSPIRACY theorists, spreading the rumors around???  Yeah, this LOSER (still not calling names here!) DESERVED to pay up, and serve that long jail sentence for, libel and slander, for spreading the unfounded rumors all right!  Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

The founder, Jones of the conspiracy theory based right wing website, “Infowars” claimed that the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting from eight years ago is a scam, to get the congress to pass the gun control bill.  His words angered the families of the Sandy Hook shooting victims to sue for libel and slander, the jury from Connecticut on the twelfth found Jones lost, and he needed to pay $956,000,000 U.S.  Jones’s attorney will appeal this.

This was Jones’s second loss, from before a jury in Texas already found that Jones need to pay the families of a six-year-old child who’d died $49,300,000 to the family of a six-year-old child who’d died in the shooting.

The 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting caused twenty students, six teachers to lose their lives, and yet, Jones kept claiming that this is the fake news that the gun control groups and the new media made up, that there WAS, no massacre, the goal of this is to get the congress to pass the gun control bills.

Many of the parents of the students who were killed started suing Jones for libel and slander in Texas and Connecticut, and one of the first FBI agent who got to the scene, sued him in Connecticut too, and testified in court.

the protesting outside his court trial…photo from online

Some of the victims’ families testified on the stand, that for over the years, they’d been, harassed by supporters of Jones, getting the death threats regularly.  The supporters of Jones had even made the fake videos of how the elementary students who were killed were living elsewhere.

As the jury in Connecticut came out with a verdict, Jones wasn’t in the courthouse, but in his show, he’d barked back, “everything was set up, it’s very funny, this is, the leftwing politicians, completely, out of control!”

Jones’s attorney stated, because the amount is way higher than they’d expected, he will be fighting for an appeal.

In the trial, although Jones admitted on the stand, that he was wrong about Sandy Hook, but he’d still, used the court as a performance stage, mocked the justice, and the procedural proceedings of the court, and called his case an insult to his right to free speech, that it’s the conspiracy of the Democrats and the news media, with the primary goals of, bankrupting him.

The district attorney’s expert witness testified, that Jones and his Infowars’s mother company, Free Speech Systems, used the large scale massacres to attract their audiences, to earn millions of dollars.  A financial expert in the trial in Texas testified that Jones and his company is worth over $27 million U.S.

In April of this year, as Jones learned that he will be faced with the huge amounts of money, he and his company, Free Speech Systems, filed for bankruptcy with the Federal District Court in Southern Texas already, to protect his own assets.

And so, this is how the Republican supporters work, just like the DDP here, they spread the unfounded rumors, with the FACTS pointing the OTHER direction, and they’re still, libeling and slandering, delusional, believing that they’re right, and yeah, we are all, letting, these, mother @#$%ERS (maxed out!) run our separate countries here.

Wow, we the people are, STUPID all right!

The Man Who’d Stalked the Woman & Threatened to Go Public with the Intimate Photos Gets Four Months after Being Caught

The “magic” of the anti-stalking laws still, “in effect” here, so, this ex got???  NOT long enough if you ask me, off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

The former temp from the city government of Taoyuan, Lee started dating a female coworker last year, became upset that she wanted to break up with him, threatened her for an entire month, and showed her the secretly filmed sex footages that they had together, threatened that he will leak it out, and told her to “finish yourself off”.  The Taoyuan District Court found that he’d impacted the woman’s mental and physical wellbeing, considered how he’d plead guilty to the charges, and had deleted the footage, sentenced him to four months on obstruction of privacy, obstruction of freedom, this can be appealed.

The investigations found, that the forty-four year-old Lee and his ex were both once temps for hire at the city government of Taoyuan, Lee became upset of how the woman told him she wanted to break up, and blocked all his calls, at 8:24 in the morn on April 27^th, he’d started flash calling her at work, threatened her to quit, claimed, “if you don’t listen, then, I will have someone go to your home, and guard your place from morning until late”, demanded the woman “move away from Bade at the end of April”, otherwise, he will post the articles, disclosing their intimate relationship to the world, even posted the photos of them having sex together online.

As Lee hung up, the threats in texts came repeatedly, and seeing how the victim didn’t respond, he’d sent the GIF files of the two of them at the motel, threatened, “do you want it in high-def”, and that was when the woman was shocked, in realizing, that she’d been, filmed, without her consent.

Lee continued with his threats until the end of May, other than threats to spread the photos and footages, he’d also mentioned of killing her and committing suicide afterwards, told the victim to kill herself, and other words, the victim finally couldn’t stand it any longer, and called the cops.

After Lee was arrested, he’d admitted to harassing the woman, deleted the footage that he’d shot without her consent, and as the preparations for trial started, he’d written his confessions of what he did; the courts criticized that he should respect the woman as they were exes, but instead, he’d used verbal threats, and made the woman live in fear.  Lee was sentenced to two months for secretly taping of the private matters, and of the privates of the body, the threats on the woman, he was given three months, and he will be serving a total of FOUR months at least in prison.

This is, if not, just that slap on the wrist of this, loser who got upset that the woman broke up with him, and guess what’s gonna happen, after he is, released, he will surely, find a wat to “get back in touch” with his victim, and start, threatening her, harassing her, because losers like this one, they just, can’t learn well enough at all, and, besides, four SHORT months, is too lenient, as he has a chances of, becoming a repeated offender, to every single woman he will be dating, and selected to break up with him.