The Instructor Was Robbed, and Was Sexually Assaulted & Murdered, the Suspect Escaped the Death Penalty & Received Life-in-Prison Instead

How is sexual assault AND murder not considered an “intentional crime with lethal or other extremely grave consequences”???  This is what TSAI wanted to achieve, before she steps down, a FINAL move toward eliminating the death penalty altogether, because the DDP is, too EAGER to get RID of the death penalty for this country…off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

The retired school instructor who’d received the teaching excellence aware, Chen, ten years ago, when she went grocery shopping, she was robbed at random by the perpetrator, Liu, sexually assaulted, then, murdered, in all of Liu’s trials, the courts gave him the death penalty, but the retrial of his fourth appeal, the collectivist courts found, that Liu’s actions did not fit to the “most severe sort of crime”, and changed his sentence to life in prison, as the families of Chen heard the verdict, they’d stated that this was the, “most awful verdict”, that it’s absolutely unfair toward the families of the victim, that they will, appeal the verdict to the very, end.

here’s a video of the debate on death penalty, from YouTube

On the day of the crime, Liu was going to see his girlfriend, with a hammer, as he passed the Hello Marketplace in Zuoying, Kaohsiung, he saw Chen opening the door to her car, he’d planned to steal her car to use it to go see his girlfriend, but instead, he’d, attacked the female instructor in the head with the hammer, and gotten into the driver’s side, then, dragged the female instructor into the back, sexually assaulted her using his fingers, and, robbed two thousand dollars N.T. from her, then, escaped, eight hours after the robbery and assault, the police discovered Chen, DEAD in her car.

The first trial found Liu guilty for sexual assault, robbery and murder, sentenced him to death, and, of the charges on sexual assault, because the district attorneys and Liu didn’t appeal, it’d been, set, Liu was sent to prison, the robbery murder parts, he’d gone through various retrials, appeals, and all the judges presiding over the cases believed that Liu used such cruel methods, gave him the death penalty on five separate, occasions, his public office post stripped for life.

The Highest Court found, that whether or not the female instructor was robbed because she had two thousand dollars N.T. on her, or that if Liu had the intent to commit murder, there’s need for more investigations on these, that there’s not enough justification for the death penalty, and sent the case back to retrial at the Kaohsiung High Subsidiary Courts, multiple, times.

the people, MARCHING against making death penalty unconstitutional…photo from online

The fourth retrial confirmed, that on the robbery part, other than Liu’s own confessing to it, there’s no other physical evidence, that Liu had randomly selected Chen to victimized, and, killed her in the process of robbing her, that it wasn’t, premeditated, that it’d not fitted to the “most serious sort of crime” clause.

The Collectivist Court based off of the psych evaluation, the assessment of sentencing given, found that Liu only needed to have a strict mean of supervision, his chances of reoffending will be, reduced, it’d, ruled out that he will, never, change, tossed back the original, verdict.

As Chen’s husband, Chang heard the verdict, accused Liu in court, that he’d targeted his wife to rob her, “doesn’t this show premeditation, and that his murder of my wife being, planned?”, the evaluation reports suggested, that there’s a, fifty-two percent chance that Liu might reoffend again, the justice disregarded the results of the evaluation, Liu committed the crime at the age of forty-seven, and is sentenced to life in prison, based off of the parole terms, he can get out of prison in his sixties, the justice had returned a murderer, a rapist back into the local communities, “Taiwan has no criteria for doing away with the death penalty”.

And this is still due to the DDP’s eager to get rid of the death penalty, and, these murderers will get released back to the wild after twenty years served, and, they will, surely kill again, because, this man committed the murder and the sexual assault in the spur of the moment, and who’s to say, that he won’t have that spur of the moment feel, after he got released, after he’d fitted to his, parole terms?  And, the life-in-prison is still BULLSHIT, because, these MURDERERS, RAPISTS will get set free into the “wild” after ten, twenty years served, because they can get paroled for “good behaviors” in prison, or that the prison is overcrowded, making this world that much more, dangerous to live in.

Without Adding More Employees on Staff, Safety of Daycare is Only Hot Air

The “treatment” proposal by the Department of Health & Social Welfares, and this is still, HINDSIGHT, and only works in THEORY, but not in the “application phase”…off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

The murdered by abuse case of Kai-Kai caused the society’s concerns for daycare agencies to grow.  Three months after the death of the young boy, the Department of Sanitation Social Welfares finally posed out the evaluations, adding the guidelines of increasing the number of visits to the nanny’s to better the quality of care.  The newly revised guideline for at-home daycare home visits stated, that other than the increased number of visits to the all day daycare and overnight care programs, the visiting officials also needed to be aware of signs of abuse, and to see if the nanny is well.

There’s no shortages of cases of nursing abuse, and many parents had long lost faith in the quality of nursery care.

The newly advised guidelines were set, to catch the child abuse earlier, but, the locally at-home daycares are with the enormous numbers, with one social worker in charge of overseeing sixty nannies, and, there are, more than just one child per nanny, and, more practically, these social workers are often, barred from the building by the attendants of the residences, or even after the attendants notified the residents, the nanny already, hit the extra children out on the balconies.

Toward the complexity of visitation, the visitors also needed to fill out the various forms, comply to the demands of the multiple government agencies, they’re, overwhelmed with the workload, and, there’s, no unison of the rules of guidelines of the visitations, some of the counties and cities issued the warnings to the nannies who aren’t up to standards, and when there’s enough violations accumulated, then, the nanny’s certification will be, pulled out.  The problems with the nannies are happening too frequently, even the legislators of the party in power told, that adding the number of visits by the social workers isn’t effective, the government should set up the guidelines, to fist, lower the ratio in social workers per case, otherwise, the plans of bettering the safety of daycare is just, hot air.

And so, this problem is due to the understaffing of the social workers, and how many cases each social workers must oversee, and this is still the government agencies, TREATING the problem, instead of preventing it in the first place, after the young boy died of abuse, the DDP then, proposed these, plans to make childcare and daycare programs, safer, and that does SHIT for the welfare of young children, because another kid died already.

The Man Was Found to Have Abused His Own Six-Year-Old Son to Death, the Jurors Sentenced Him Heavily to Sixteen Years

Abused his own six-year-old son to death, and all he got was still, a slap on the wrist, only SIXTEEN years, it should be LIFE without ANY chances of PAROLE, for MURDERING his own young, on the sorry EXCUSE of, “discipline”…off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

He’d, Beaten His Six-Year-Old with the Cloth Hangers, Forced Him to Stand in the Nude as Punishment, Soaking the Child in Hot Water to Get the Bruises Out, the Courts Affirmed the D.A.’s Office is Asking for the Most Severe Sentencing

The man, Hsu in Taichung, had multiple times hit his own six-year-old son with the hangers and the cords of the plugs, forced his young to strip and stand nude, he’d worried that the injuries he’d inflicted on the child may get found, told the six-year-old child to soak in a plastic tub of hot water to “reduce the bruising faster”, for over an hour; and the six-year-old young boy passed out due to rhabdomyolysis, and drowned inside the container, the district attorneys charged the man with adult abusing an underage minor to death, the jurors sentenced Hsu heavily to sixteen years.

The key debate of the focus was in if Hsu’s behaviors was “torturing causing death” or “involuntary manslaughter”.  After three days of examining the facts presented, in the end, the jurors took the stance of the district attorneys, found Hsu guilty for torturing a minor to death, and because he is a repeated offender in abuse, the jurors decided to add to his sentence, sixteen years was the maximum limit for this charge given.

The district attorneys claimed, that when the boy was only four, there’d been records on file for domestic violence, the social services mandated Hsu into the parenting lessons, but Hsu continued physically abusing his son, and he’d worried that he might get found out, kept taking his son out of school on absences, up to a total of forty-two days at a time; the coroners’ autopsy showed, that the boy had a total of forty-two old and new injuries, large hematoma surface areas on him, which showed how Hsu grew worse in abusing his son, plus Hsu had prior records of serving time, he had almost no response for the sentence in deterring him from abusing his own son to death, the district attorneys asked the courts to sentence him heavily, and, asked for a total of thirteen years six months to sixteen years.

Hsu’s attorney defended him, that Hsu didn’t evade responsibilities of what he did, but because he wasn’t educated enough, lacked the medical knowledge, did NOT see the errors in his means of reducing the bruising in his young, causing the rhabdomyolysis to occur, causing the young boy to drown to death, that at most, he was guilty of leaving his own son in the bathrooms alone, which caused the “accidental drowning”, that he should be charged on negligent death, that the sentence at the most severe, should not exceed eleven years.

Hsu testified, that he’d gotten “too upset and physically disciplined his son” harder, but he’d, put the ointment on his child, later, as he saw his son being, severely injured, that was why he’d used the plastic container, filled the container up with hot water, “for the bruises to go away faster”, and didn’t know that he’d caused his own young son to drown.

Hsu’s mother begged on her own son’s behalf, “all parents love their own young”, she’d used the corporal punishment methods to teach him when he was young too, “it’s my fault, I’d, not been the right model for him”, as Hsu heard his mother, he’d, melted down, and cried hard in court.

The thirty-eight year-old Hsu tortured his own young six-year-old son to death, at the end of last month, the jurors of Taichung heard the case for three days, with the Chinese Medical University Pediatric Department physicians, the coroners’, the school instructors, the cohabiting partner of Hsu, Hsu’s mother, to testify,

And so, this still showed, how, ABUSE is like GENETICS, passed down from one generation to the next, because the mother told the courts, that she’d, BEATEN the son up when he’d misbehaved himself as a kid, that was why, he’d used the, corporal punishment means to “train” his own young son to behave too, and sixteen years being the highest the offender is allowed to get for the charge of ABUSING a kid to death, that’s still, NOT, heavy enough.  I mean, how would you feel, that you’d been, ABUSED physically to death, on the EXCUSE of it being, “discipline”, and the one who’d ABUSED you to DEATH, got away, with “accidentally MURDERING” you, huh?  This is, unjust, and yet, that’s how the law works, it doesn’t still.

An Unemployed Man Abused His Own Son to Death, His Wife Inquired About it, and Got Her Teeth Knocked Out

A VIOLENT man, with the PRIORS of PHYSICAL abuse, can’t control his temper, lost his job, and everything combined, turned into, MURDER and DOMESTIC, violence…off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

The twenty-two-year-old unemployed man, Feng became a stay-at-home dad, because his three-months-old young son started getting fussy, he’d become impatient, beaten the infant until he’d sustained brain injury, until he saw his son’s lips turned purple, did he then realize, that he’d done something awful, the infant was then rushed to the hospital, on ECMO, and resuscitated for a month and a half, and, pronounced dead, the Taichung D.A.’s Office charged Feng on domestic violence manslaughter, the case will be tried by a jury.

The investigation found, that on December 10^th, 2023, Feng in his home in the eastside of Taichung, became impatient of his own young son’s continual cries, lost control, started beating his young son’s face, head, to slamming the infant, causing the infant to sustain brain damage from the external traumas, subdural hematoma of his visual cortex, and he’d not stopped abusing the infant until he’d, stopped, crying.

The infant was beaten to nose bleed, and Feng took a few tissues and wiped the blood from the infant’s nose, until early in the evening, as he saw his son’s corner of the lips turned purple, unresponsive, then he’d notified his own wife, Lai emergently, then Lai called the emergency services, but before the infant boy got to the hospital, he’d, stopped breathing, showed no signs of life.

Although the hospital put the infant on ECMO, and got his vital signs back, the infant was in a coma, after a little over a month in the hospital, the family decided to take him off of life support this year on January 26^th, and the infant died from the brain injuries, and encephalitis.

The district attorney also discovered, that after Feng beaten his own young son to injury, as Lai asked him what happened, they’d started verbally altercating, when he’d, physically abused his own wife, broken her front teeth, causing her to sustain contusions on her face and nose.

As Feng was taken into custody, he’d denied the allegations of abuse on his own young son, claimed that his son accidentally bumped his head into the steering wheel while he was driving, then changed his statement that he was carrying the infant, accidentally fell, and he’d, injured his own young, but the D.A. compared the testimonies and the autopsy report, not believed him.

And so, this is awful, how after this man abused his own young son to death, he’d, evaded responsibility too.  He’d, ABUSED his wife as she’d inquired him on the abuse of their, young too.  This LOSER needs to get charged with MURDER and DOMESTIC violence, and gets LOCKED away for fifty-plus years, and it still won’t be “just” enough, because he’d, MURDERED his own young son by abuse!

The Nanny Got Annoyed by Hearing the Infant Boy Fuss, in Three Day, He’d Been Physically Abused Twenty Time

And yes, the woman is still, CERTIFIED to take care of the children here, but she couldn’t stand the child’s cries, and, LOST it!!!  Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

Another Case of Abuse by Certified Nanny!  She’d Continually Shaken Him and Slammed Him Down, the Six-Months-Old Infant Boy Suffered from Subdural Hematoma, and the Optical Nerve Ruptures, Causing Him to Become Epileptic

The certified nanny, Yeh had only begun to look after a six-months-old infant boy, when she was suspected of being emotionally unstable, continually slamming, shaking the infant boy as many as twenty times, causing the infant boy to hemorrhage in the skulls, to bleed at the base of his eyes, to developing epilepsy.  The Hsinbei District Attorneys Office indicted Yeh on charges of children and adolescent welfare, and criminally for the adult intentionally harming a child or infant.

The investigations found that Yeh was certified as a nanny by the government, started in 2020, she’d begun working full-time as a nanny.  Started back on February 19^th, she’d taken on the daytime care of the young infant boy, but was suspected of being unable to handle the infant fussing, lost her emotional control, she was suspected of continually throwing the infant onto the floors down on his back, shaking him, causing the infant to sustain traumas to his brains and eyes too.

After the infant was returned back to the parents, he’d started exerting signs of loss of appetite, high fever, twitching, drowsy, and becoming limp, the parents took him to the pediatrician, he’d not gotten better, in the midnight hours of the following day, they’d rushed him into the McKay Memorial Pediatric I.C.U. of Taipei.  After the examinations, the infant was found to have bleeding in his cranium, and at the base of his eyes, and the subdural hematoma has caused him to become epileptic too, the hospital suspected that he’d been, shaken to have caused this severity of brain damage.

The infant boy showed an expansion of his corpus callosum, which meant that his brain had shrunk in size, whether or not this will cause him to have any developmental delays, only time will, tell; although the epilepsy was under control, he may be on medication for the rest of his life, as for the blood clot at the base of his eyes, it’d become smaller after the medications, but the neurologists were unsure of the effects that the injury may have on the infant’s sight in the future, that in the future, he would need to watch out for the problems of retinal detachment, and other eye conditions.

The case was reported by the hospital, the district attorney’s office, the police stepped into investigate, they went to Yeh’s home to search, and from the surveillance of the home daycare, they’d seen Yeh slammed the boy multiple times, jostled him, pulling on the infant boy inappropriately repeatedly on the surveillance footages.  Yeh admitted to physically abusing the infant, but claimed that it was because he wouldn’t stop crying, that was why she’d, becoming violent with him physically.

The D.A. believed, that Yeh’s behavior caused the infant boy to suffer from irreparable physical injuries including paralysis, damages in his sight, etc., etc., etc., indicted on the charges of adult intentionally harming a young child, causing children severe developmental delays, which, if proven guilty, will get her five years to twelve years of prison term, and, based off of the laws of child and adolescent protection, the punishment for her may be increased by half.

The one-year-old boy, “Kai-Kai” last year was suspected of getting abused to death by the certified sitters, Liu,, both were listed as certified nanny for children waiting for adoption by the Children’s Welfare League, with certifications issued by the government; and now, this case of another certified nanny, abusing a young male infant to brain damage happened.

So, being certified by the government means???  Oh yeah, SHIT, that’s what being certified by the government means.  I mean IF you can’t be patient enough, to withstand a young infant crying like crazy (and they will, CRY like crazy, as some of these babies were just born, too, “fussy”…), and, if you can’t etch that into your brains, then, you have NO business taking care of infants, and because there’s NOT a stricter check of qualification (I mean, there should be the observation period during the “internship” of becoming a nanny…too see how those who want to become nannies handle babies who cried nonstop!), but there isn’t, that’s why this SHIT keeps on happening, besides, when you’re having a bad day as is, and that baby in your care starts to cry out of term, that would make you want to STRANGLE her/him, that’s only naturally, but you should’ve had better emotional controls, and yet, you don’t!

The Laws Against Child Abuse Not Effective Enough, How Many of the Cases Got, Buried

The application, the implementations of these, child abuse prevention laws are still, NOT as easy as, theorized here!  Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

A home-based nanny, Wang in Kaohsiung was suspecting of abusing a five-months-old infant boy to cranial fracture, and the infant is still in the neonatal I.C.U. in that tug-of-war with, death to date.  There’s also a case of a young infant under the age of one, at an all-day daycare nursery, who was found to have been abused and sustained subdural hematoma.  The three-months-old infant, Kai-Kai being abused to death shocked the society, before this case settled, there’d been multiple cases coming on.  Although the legislature and the law committee passed the increased penalties for the abuse of young children yesterday, but the laws in relating to this, only works in theory, how many cases of infant or child abuse are there in the society, currently, covered up?

For instance, the Social Services Home agencies hosted a discussion on using the surveillance at the nurseries, forcing the nurseries to comply, but there’s no mention of the abuse prevention of the homebased nannies.

And so, this just showed, how the theories of the government’s implementing the policy of forcing the nursing centers to install the surveillance cameras to ensure the safety of these babies work so very well, but NOT in the application phase, as there’s the debates of how the surveilling would be an invasion of privacy of the workers, and the laws to have a stricter background check for these, caretakers of young children still don’t come, fast enough, besides, some people are really excellent, in masking themselves up, they paint themselves as caring, loving, caretakers, when in reality, they abuse, and that doesn’t show up in the background checks, or the face-to-face interviews conducted when you’re hiring a caretaker for your, children, so, nobody will be, safe!

The Five-Months-Old Infant Suspected of Being Abused to Critical Condition, the Nanny Taken in

Blaming the infant for being, “difficult” and “too fussy”…and she’s still, CHARGED, and gotten her nanny license, revoked!  Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

The Infant Found to Have Multiple Fractures on His Skull, Still Not Out of Critical Danger, the Social Services of Kaohsiung Ruled the Nanny to Stop Taking the Children, into Her Care, at the Same Time, Two Toddlers Under the Woman’s Care Got Referred Emergently

A five-months-old young infant boy, was rushed to the hospital for emergency resuscitation measures, the hospital found that the young infant had multiple fractures on his skull, after they resuscitated him, he’s still not out of critical danger yet; the nanny who was in charge of caring for the infant boy, Wang, was suspected of having abused him, but she’d denied it, the district attorney’s office suspected that she was involved in causing the child’s injuries, asked the courts to have her in custody, the courts had signed off on it.  Wang also had two other toddlers under her care, and there weren’t any injuries on them, they were emergently referred by the social services to another caretaker.

A woman who claimed to be a good family friend of the young infant boy disclosed online yesterday, that on April 10^th, the infant boy’s families arrived at the nanny’s home, found the infant limp, and the nanny “called up an UBER to get him to the hospital” instead of an ambulance; the friend suspected that Wang was trying to, cover up the truth of what happened to the toddler, hoped that the justice system will investigate the matter, thoroughly.

what the hidden camera captured…photo from online

Based off of the investigations of the law enforcement officials, after Wang started taking care of the infant boy, the infant boy started having bruises on his body, on the tenth, when the mother of the infant came to pick the infant up, she’d found her son semi-conscious, rushed him to the Kaohsiung Medical Center.

The hospital diagnoses found the infant boy to have multiple fractures on the right side of his skull, visual nerve hematoma, severe swelling of the brain, and after surgery, he was in the I.C.U. still not out of danger ye, the hospital wrote on the diagnoses, “suspicions of child abuse”, and started up the reporting of child abuse, and the case started being investigated on by the local subprecinct in Gushan,

The police based off of the medical report and the infant boy’s mother’s testimonies, suspected that the infant had been abused by Wang, had the district attorney’s office to take her into custody; in the interview with the woman on the twelfth, Wang denied the allegations of abuse, but considering the severity of the infant’s injuries, and she still cared for other toddlers, that there’s the risk of her injuring other children again.  The district attorneys charged Wang on assault, asked the courts to have her into police custody, the courts signed off on it.

signs of physical abuse in a young infant…photo from online

Back in 2014, Wang got certified as a nanny, and in her ten years of work, she’d taken on a total of eleven children, there wasn’t any bad record from before.  Based off of the disclosures, Wang had told the parents of this young infant boy, that he was difficult to care for, “I was thrilled by him, that in such a short time, it’d come down to, this.”, and told, that if the parents can’t work with her, then, she can only, stop, taking care of him, “all I hear is his cries, from the footages right now.”

The social services of Kaohsiung told, because Wang is already in police custody, the social services pulled the plug on her nursery care services, and, they’re, transferring the two other toddlers under her care, and they’d already filed the independent physical abuse charges, if it’s been proven that she had, abused the infant boy, she will be taken off the registry of fitting nannies.

And so, this is another, case of infant abuse, because this infant boy is too fussy, too difficult to care, the nanny lost it, and, hurt the infant, and now, she’s, charged.  This still just showed, how it don’t matter IF you find a certified nanny, this SHIT can still, happen, because the infants will cry, and the adults, lose their, tempers.

Gotten into an Argument in Gambling Money, the Migrant Worker Who was Mediating Got Stabbed to Death by a Fellow Migrant Worker from His Country

How this man, who stepped in the middle of a fight between his fellow countrymen got, stabbed to death, and now, someone will pay for his, murder!  On crime and punishment, off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

Five Vietnamese men were in their rental stay, gambling, of the two who’d played the games, one lost, they’d started altercating, and flashed the weapons, Truong, a migrant worker, attempted to dissolve the fight, as stabbed in the right side of his thorax, died; the four Vietnamese bystanders who were there saw that Truong had been killed, they all ran off scattered, the police took every one of them in, and found out that it was the migrant worker, Hoang committed the stabbing, charged him on murder, sent him to the D.A.’s office.

The investigators found, that the victim came here legally in 2020 to work, shortly after he started working, he’d escaped, and was reported as a runaway migrant worker, through the introduction of a fellow runaway migrant worker, the forty-two year-old Nguyen, found a stay on a fourth floor apartment in Linkou, Hsinbei City.

The fourth floor was rented out by a Vietnamese person, and Nguyen was asked by the Vietnamese landlord to manage the property for him, other than Truong, the twenty-four-year-old Nguyen, the thirty-four year old, To, and the fifty-year-old Nguyen also shared the apartment, they’re all of Vietnamese nationality, but only the twenty-four year-old Nguyen is legal, the other man, Nguyen, age fifty stayed in the country on an expired tourist visa, the other three are the migrant workers who escaped.

Two evenings ago, the five were drinking, and gambled on the dices, until midnight last, Hoang was suspected of upset of how the twenty-four year-old Nguyen kept on winning, and gloated, he was cussed at, they got into a fierce argument, Hoang screamed, “I dare you to tell that to me again!”, Nguyen started cussing him out, the altercation became, full-blown.

Hoang took out a fruit knife from his pack, stabbed toward Nguyen, Tran went up to try to stop, he was stabbed on the right side of his chest twice, fell to the floor, the rest saw, immediately helped Tran downstairs, flagged down a cab, gotten him to the hospital, but he’d died, from losing too much, blood.

The police were called, rushed to the hospital, and saw only the deceased victim, they’d gone back to the scene of the crime, saw blood from the first floor leading up to the fourth, the living room had blood all over the places, and they found the weapon, and the bloodied clothe in one of the bedrooms, while the four Vietnamese men were all, gone; the police chased the leads, and took all into custody at two in the morning.

At first, Hoang denied having stabbed the victim, after the other three testified, that was when he’d admitted, claimed that he’d stabbed Tran by accident, the police charged him on murder after interrogating him; the two runaway migrant workers, and the man on the expired visa were all turned over to the offices of immigrations, getting deported.

And so, this is how this fight broke out, and, there’s still that LACK of impulse control, and angry words flew, and, someone got insulted, and reacted to the words that were blurted out toward him, and, attacked someone, killing the migrant worker.

The Lone Wolf Attacker, Hacking People at Random, in the Shopping Center of Sydney, Six Dead

With the reason of the random hacking still under investigation right now…off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

BBC and other foreign media press reported on the thirteenth, that at the Bondi Junction Westfield at three local time in Sydney there was a random hacking attack, resulted in six fatalities.  The police pointed out, that the suspect is a forty year old male, that he’d acted alone, and was already shot to death by a female officer at the site, and the police is ruling out this incident as a terrorist attack.

the news story off of YouTube

The PM of Australia, Albanese issued a statement after the attack, that this was a shocking, horrifying act of violence, targeting the innocent people who are, bystanders, and all of these who’d been injured or killed, were only shopping on a regular weekend afternoon.  But he’d also stated, that there was no motives found for this act of violence, and called the female officer who killed the attacker a “hero”.

And, as for why the authorities believed, that this is not an act of terrorism, Webber explained, based off of police understanding, a few key characteristics can explain why, but the police is still currently investigating into the background of the suspect, where he lived, worked, his coworkers, friends, and the cars that he’d used; as for the motives, it’s too early to speculate at this time.

Based off of the footages on the social media, there are people shopping at the mall, many were mothers with their young, the panic crowd started running off into the sky bridge to escape, some had found their ways into the parking lot, and left by car.  Multiple police vehicles, emergency service vehicles had, arrived on site, and started up, sealing up the scene.

the shoppers, walking away…photo from online

And so, this is, a random hacking, and, there’s no reasons found yet, of why this man went on a shooting rampage, this case showed how important it is, for gun control to be set into place, because if anyone can get her/his hands on a dangerous weapon, then, we might as well all have that target on our, backs!

Seven of the Hamas Leader’s Sons and Grandchildren Died in a Bomb Raid, and He Still Stated: We will NOT Waver

For the cause of what was it again???  Gaining CONTROL of ISRAEL, the insurgent groups are, willing to, SACRIFICE all that they know, to keep their, causes, going on strong?  What does that show???  That people are willing to, let their own flesh and blood DIE, for an, ideology!  Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…

The Israeli-Palestine Conflict is still ongoing, BBC reported, that the leader of the Hamas, Haniyeh confirmed, his three sons and four grandsons died in the air raid of Gaza with the Israeli forces.

Media press related to Hamas claimed, that Haniyeh’s sons were HIT in the refugee camps outside of the city of Gaza.  Haniyeh who wasn’t there stated, that this incident would NOT sway him on the terms or the goals of the ceasefire negotiations.

The news station reported, that Haniyah confirmed that his three sons were in the car, ready to head off to the Muslim Feast of the Breaking Fast, when the car they were in got hit by the missiles from a drone, his three sons and four grandson all died.

Haniyeh issued a statement, and criticized “this attack is cowardice and the act of weakness”, if the enemies think, that as we reached a height in the peace negotiations, murdering my son can change the Hamas’ standing, that’s completely, delusional.”

Haniyeh stated, that the hopes for the future, and freedom is to come from the sacrifices of these, martyrs.  He said, there were, close to sixty next-of-kin of his who’d died in the war, including nephews, nieces, that he’d suffered the same losses as other, Palestinians.

The Israeli military pointed out, that they’d, destroyed three military officials of Hamas in the Gaza region, and claimed that they were Haniyeh’s sons.  But, in the statement, it’d not mentioned of the death of Haniyeh’s grandson.

So, the Israeli’s MURDERING the sons of the head of Hamas only gives him justified reason to keep on fighting, because you’d MURDERED my children, and therefore, I will, try and KILL off ALL of yours, and this war will, NEVER end, which fitted to the western world’s, desires, because the more you guys fight, the more we strike it rich on selling you the arms…