The U.S. Stands to Gain the Most Out of the Ukrainian-Russian Conflicts

How the U.S is, the opportunist!  Observations from the Front Page Sections, translated…

Some analyzed that the U.S. is the tactical loser of the War of Ukraine and Russia, while Russia is the winner of tactics, and as I’d, analyzed the results based off of the war itself, I’d come up with a different, conclusion.

I believe, that the Ukrainian-Russian War had been under America’s thumbs all along.  Right after the U.S.S.R. fell, the U.S. started encouraging the “color revolutions” in the countries of Asia, and set up the laws of pushing N.A.T.O. eastward, and set up the rockets, and other arms right outside Russia’s, front door, forced Russia to react, which was what the U.S. already, expected.  And, right before the war actually happened, President Biden called aloud “wolf!”, which made Russia throw that very first, punch.

Seeing how war is already occurred, Putin didn’t expect that Ukraine was going to fight this hard, and failed to take over the capital of Kyiv, and now, the two sides are, negotiating, but, both didn’t, live up to expectations.  At the end of the war, no matter who won, both sides suffer, so, how can Russia be the, “tactical winner”?

I believe, that after the Ukrainian-Russian conflicts, U.S. stands the most to gain:

First, the great harvest for the arms dealer in U.S., creating more jobs, and economical growth for the U.S., and at the same time of the harvest of the arms dealers, it’s also, a big win for the mid-terms elections of the Democratic Party.

here’s that political comic for you! From online

Secondly, Russian invasion on Ukraine is bullying, which made Putin’s standing drop considerable internationally, lessening the threats, the power of the Russian forces, and in the future, it’d ensured that Russia will no longer be a big enough threat to the U.S. anymore.

Third, the leadership of U.S. in N.A.T.O. had been weakened these past years, and, the war won back the leadership support of U.S. in N.A.T.O.  Especially for the primary members of Germany and France, that often gone different ways in tactics in war.  Germany and France’s failure in trying to achieve peace in the conflicts caused the two countries to be disappointed in Russia, and they got onboard U.S.’s calling out to other members of N.A.T.O. to force the arbitration means against Russia, which united the west in going against Russia.

Fourth, although the war between Ukraine and Russia caused China to get closer with Russia, which is a huge disadvantage to Europe and U.S., but for China, it turned, hesitant.  As Russia was faced with the “most severe economic arbitration” from the west, China didn’t show enough concern, to solve the financial crisis that Russia was faced with, this is a huge warning for Putin.  And, this caused Russia to distrust China more.

From the analysis above, although President Biden was inept in running the U.S. (on internal affairs!), but, in the tactic settings of the international front, he surely, played his cards, right.

And so this still showed, how U.S. merely, used all of these other countries in the world as pawns, chips in this huge gamble, and, the histories tell us, that it’s the bystanders, those on the outside, watching in, who stands to gain the most in these, international, major, conflicts.  Besides, history is proof of how U.S. never get on the defensive, unless the country was HIT physically, like in Pearl Harbor, or September 11^th?