Properly Dressed, Just Talking, Doesn’t Count as Soliciting? He’d Only Fondled and Not Had Sex…She Got the Money She

Yeah, uh, you’ve GOT to be SHITTING me here, right???  From the Front Page Sections, translated…

A woman, Pan was accused of solicitations at a motel by the police, and she was fined $5,000N.T.s based off of the laws that protected orders in the society, she felt it was unjustifiable, claimed that her john claimed to have erectile dysfunction, and that they’d merely touched each other, with their clothes on, that they never engaged in sexual intercourse, she’d taken the fine slips to the courts to appeal it.  The Taipei District Court believed that the police didn’t specify the charges clearly enough, found that Pan won, and dismissed the charges against her, Pan didn’t have to get fined, and the police couldn’t fight for the rulings to be overturned.

The verdict stated, that sexual intercourse meant that someone IS paid for sexual behavior or inappropriate sexual actions, but in this case, whether or not Pan had been engaged in such activities, nobody can confirm.

The police accused, on the evening of May 6th this year, Pan met up at a hotel near to the CKS Memorial Hall with Lin, to have sexual intercourse, and Pan had taken $500N.T.s from Lin for sex, that she’d broken the laws of societal order, and so, the police were fining her $1,500N.T.s.

Pan stated that she’d known Lin for a long time, and the surveillance from the hotel showed that she’d entered into the suite by herself, that it goes against Lin’s claims of how they’d struck up a conversation in the hallways of the hotel then, walked into the suite together, and, the police had confiscated the $500N.T. that she had, which the police asked her to turn over, “The money was NOT for the sex”.

Lin testified, that he did meet Pan for the very first time in the hallways of the hotel, asked if Pan wanted to have a conversation with him, and so, after the two of them entered into his suite, he’d told Pan, that he had erectile dysfunction, then, Pan gave him a “hand job with his pants on, and fully dressed for about five seconds.”, he’d later paid Pan $500N.T. for it, that in the process of being touched by Pan, she’d never told him that she could do anything extra for him.

The judge had investigated into the matter, and pointed out, that based off of Lin’s testimonies, it couldn’t prove, that they did have an agreement to have sex for money, and that the police couldn’t make the decisions, that they were selling and buying sexual activities based off of the fact that before Lin left the hotel room, he had paid Pan.

This will open up, a HUGE door for those johns and the whores, after all, we’re NOT doing anything that is DESTROYING the orders of the society, I’m merely touching him, with HIS pants on, and I didn’t ask her to give ME a “handjob”, she did that all on her own, and besides, we’d NEVER agreed on the amount which I’d be paying her, yeah uh, this only opens UP that HUGE door, because this is, the blurred line of the law here.

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Awareness, Being Exposed, Crime & Punishment, Excuses, Improper Misconducts, Issues of the Society, Knowing the Law and Breaking It, Messed Up Values, News Stories, Sex Sells, sexual misconducts, Social Awareness, Social Issues, White Picket Fence

Say What You Want to...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s